Abstract
The ability to measure normality and abnormality and to accurately assess true changes in swallowing function over time, is important for the management of dysphagia. Despite this, there is a paucity of information regarding the stability and reliability of measurements tools used for dysphagia research. As both head and neck (H&N) cancer and its treatment(s) have been shown to significantly affect deglutitive tongue function, it is important that we have a reliable method to measure swallowing tongue function in this population. In this study we evaluate the reliability and stability of oro-lingual swallowing pressures captured from H&N cancer patients and from healthy, age- and gender-matched controls using the Kay Swallowing Workstation (KSW) fixed, three-transducer tongue pressure array. Significant differences between the two samples (H&N cancer and controls), with respect to mean peak oro-lingual pressures were recorded during swallowing. Furthermore, reliability of these measures was lower in H&N cancer patients. These differences highlight the importance of obtaining information about the reliability of dysphagia assessment tools with the specific population with whom they will be used.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 137-144 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Dysphagia |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2009 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Deglutition
- Deglutition disorders
- Dysphagia
- Head and neck cancer
- Oro-lingual swallowing pressures
- Reliability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of the reliability and stability of oro-lingual swallowing pressures in patients with head and neck cancer and healthy adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver