TY - JOUR
T1 - A flexible parametric modelling framework for survival analysis
AU - Burke, Kevin
AU - Jones, M. C.
AU - Noufaily, Angela
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Royal Statistical Society
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - We introduce a general, flexible, parametric survival modelling framework which encompasses key shapes of hazard functions (constant; increasing; decreasing; up then down; down then up) and various common survival distributions (log-logistic; Burr type XII; Weibull; Gompertz) and includes defective distributions (cure models). This generality is achieved by using four distributional parameters: two scale-type parameters—one of which relates to accelerated failure time (AFT) modelling; the other to proportional hazards (PH) modelling—and two shape parameters. Furthermore, we advocate ‘multiparameter regression’ whereby more than one distributional parameter depends on covariates—rather than the usual convention of having a single covariate-dependent (scale) parameter. This general formulation unifies the most popular survival models, enabling us to consider the practical value of possible modelling choices. In particular, we suggest introducing covariates through just one or other of the two scale parameters (covering AFT and PH models), and through a ‘power’ shape parameter (covering more complex non-AFT or non-PH effects); the other shape parameter remains covariate independent and handles automatic selection of the baseline distribution. We explore inferential issues and compare with alternative models through various simulation studies, with particular focus on evidence concerning the need, or otherwise, to include both AFT and PH parameters. We illustrate the efficacy of our modelling framework by using data from lung cancer, melanoma and kidney function studies. Censoring is accommodated throughout.
AB - We introduce a general, flexible, parametric survival modelling framework which encompasses key shapes of hazard functions (constant; increasing; decreasing; up then down; down then up) and various common survival distributions (log-logistic; Burr type XII; Weibull; Gompertz) and includes defective distributions (cure models). This generality is achieved by using four distributional parameters: two scale-type parameters—one of which relates to accelerated failure time (AFT) modelling; the other to proportional hazards (PH) modelling—and two shape parameters. Furthermore, we advocate ‘multiparameter regression’ whereby more than one distributional parameter depends on covariates—rather than the usual convention of having a single covariate-dependent (scale) parameter. This general formulation unifies the most popular survival models, enabling us to consider the practical value of possible modelling choices. In particular, we suggest introducing covariates through just one or other of the two scale parameters (covering AFT and PH models), and through a ‘power’ shape parameter (covering more complex non-AFT or non-PH effects); the other shape parameter remains covariate independent and handles automatic selection of the baseline distribution. We explore inferential issues and compare with alternative models through various simulation studies, with particular focus on evidence concerning the need, or otherwise, to include both AFT and PH parameters. We illustrate the efficacy of our modelling framework by using data from lung cancer, melanoma and kidney function studies. Censoring is accommodated throughout.
KW - Accelerated failure time
KW - Multiparameter regression
KW - Power generalized Weibull distribution
KW - Proportional hazards
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079747212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/rssc.12398
DO - 10.1111/rssc.12398
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85079747212
SN - 0035-9254
VL - 69
SP - 429
EP - 457
JO - Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics
JF - Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics
IS - 2
ER -