TY - JOUR
T1 - A Focused look at spatial assessment in Technology & Engineering education
AU - McNea, Meryn
AU - Tanner, David
AU - Lane, Diarmaid
AU - Cole, Reena
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This systematic scoping review examines the application of spatial assessment tools within Technology and Engineering (T& E) education, evaluating their capacity to capture the multifaceted nature of spatial reasoning required in these domains. The analysis reveals a predominant reliance on standardised instruments that assess isolated spatial abilities, thereby neglecting broader competencies such as large-scale and embodied spatial reasoning fundamental to T& E practice. Furthermore, the review identifies persistent gender-related disparities and structural biases embedded within current assessment frameworks, which may perpetuate inequities and constrain participation among underrepresented groups, particularly women. By synthesising evidence from peer-reviewed literature, the study underscores the limitations of prevailing assessment paradigms and advocates for the development of more comprehensive, contextually situated instruments. Such approaches are essential to advancing equity, fostering inclusive educational practices, and aligning spatial assessment more closely with the cognitive and practical demands of contemporary T& E education.
AB - This systematic scoping review examines the application of spatial assessment tools within Technology and Engineering (T& E) education, evaluating their capacity to capture the multifaceted nature of spatial reasoning required in these domains. The analysis reveals a predominant reliance on standardised instruments that assess isolated spatial abilities, thereby neglecting broader competencies such as large-scale and embodied spatial reasoning fundamental to T& E practice. Furthermore, the review identifies persistent gender-related disparities and structural biases embedded within current assessment frameworks, which may perpetuate inequities and constrain participation among underrepresented groups, particularly women. By synthesising evidence from peer-reviewed literature, the study underscores the limitations of prevailing assessment paradigms and advocates for the development of more comprehensive, contextually situated instruments. Such approaches are essential to advancing equity, fostering inclusive educational practices, and aligning spatial assessment more closely with the cognitive and practical demands of contemporary T& E education.
KW - engineering education
KW - gender disparity
KW - gender performance
KW - spatial assessment
KW - Spatial competency
KW - technology education
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022716201
U2 - 10.1080/03043797.2025.2572027
DO - 10.1080/03043797.2025.2572027
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105022716201
SN - 0304-3797
JO - European Journal of Engineering Education
JF - European Journal of Engineering Education
ER -