TY - JOUR
T1 - A Prospective Multi-institutional Study Using a Novel Safety Valve for the Prevention of Catheter Balloon Inflation Injury of the Urethra
AU - O'Connor, Eabhann M.
AU - Croghan, Stefanie M.
AU - Baird, Olivia
AU - Fallon, John
AU - Loughman, Peter
AU - Esoof, Jibraan
AU - Keenan, Robert A.
AU - Ryan, James
AU - Manecksha, Rustom
AU - D'Arcy, Frank
AU - Purtill, Helen
AU - Varma, Raghav
AU - Thursby, Helen
AU - Matkowski, Amber
AU - El Hadi, Sami
AU - Mahmalji, Wasim
AU - Giri, Subhasis K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Purpose:We prospectively assessed the ability of a novel transurethral catheterization safety valve to prevent urethral catheter balloon injury in a multi-institutional clinical setting.Materials and Methods:A prospective, multi-institution study was conducted. The safety valve was introduced for urinary catheterization in 6 hospital groups (4 in Ireland; 2 in the UK). The safety valve allows fluid in the catheter system to vent through a pressure relief valve if attempted intraurethral inflation of the catheter's anchoring balloon occurs. Device usage was studied over a 12-month period, with data recorded using a 7-item data sticker containing a scannable QR code. "Venting" through the safety valve during catheterization was indicative of prevention of a urethral injury. An embedded 3-month study was conducted in 3 centers, with any catheter balloon injuries occurring during catheterization without safety valve use referred to the on-call urology team recorded. Health economic analyses were also performed.Results:During the overall 12-month device study phase, 994 urethral catheterizations were performed across study sites. Twenty-two (2.2%) episodes of safety valve venting were recorded. No urethral injuries occurred in these patients. In the embedded 3-month study, 18 catheter balloon injuries were recorded in association with catheterizations performed without the safety valve. Based on confirmed and device-prevented urethral injuries, the injury rate for urethral catheterization without safety valve use was calculated to be 5.5/1,000 catheterizations.Conclusions:The safety valve has the potential to eliminate catheter balloon injury if widely adopted. It represents a simple, effective, and innovative solution to this recurring problem applicable to all patient cohorts.
AB - Purpose:We prospectively assessed the ability of a novel transurethral catheterization safety valve to prevent urethral catheter balloon injury in a multi-institutional clinical setting.Materials and Methods:A prospective, multi-institution study was conducted. The safety valve was introduced for urinary catheterization in 6 hospital groups (4 in Ireland; 2 in the UK). The safety valve allows fluid in the catheter system to vent through a pressure relief valve if attempted intraurethral inflation of the catheter's anchoring balloon occurs. Device usage was studied over a 12-month period, with data recorded using a 7-item data sticker containing a scannable QR code. "Venting" through the safety valve during catheterization was indicative of prevention of a urethral injury. An embedded 3-month study was conducted in 3 centers, with any catheter balloon injuries occurring during catheterization without safety valve use referred to the on-call urology team recorded. Health economic analyses were also performed.Results:During the overall 12-month device study phase, 994 urethral catheterizations were performed across study sites. Twenty-two (2.2%) episodes of safety valve venting were recorded. No urethral injuries occurred in these patients. In the embedded 3-month study, 18 catheter balloon injuries were recorded in association with catheterizations performed without the safety valve. Based on confirmed and device-prevented urethral injuries, the injury rate for urethral catheterization without safety valve use was calculated to be 5.5/1,000 catheterizations.Conclusions:The safety valve has the potential to eliminate catheter balloon injury if widely adopted. It represents a simple, effective, and innovative solution to this recurring problem applicable to all patient cohorts.
KW - health care economics and organizations, technology
KW - patient safety
KW - urethral stricture
KW - urinary catheterization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85162872940&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/JU.0000000000003449
DO - 10.1097/JU.0000000000003449
M3 - Article
C2 - 37000009
AN - SCOPUS:85162872940
SN - 0022-5347
VL - 210
SP - 179
EP - 184
JO - Journal of Urology
JF - Journal of Urology
IS - 1
ER -