Abstract
The authors present a thinly veiled attack on the popular Grammatical Evolution (GE) system, the second in the space of year. The paper presents itself as a philosophical discussion on a framework they present, based on a handful of Sterelny’s guidelines. However, it quickly degenerates into an assault on GE, initially by attributing assumptions to the inventors, and latterly by the use of misleading claims. This rebuttal addresses both of these.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 385-389 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sep 2017 |
Keywords
- CFG-GP
- Grammatical evolution
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A rebuttal to Whigham, Dick, and Maclaurin by one of the inventors of Grammatical Evolution: Commentary on “On the Mapping of Genotype to Phenotype in Evolutionary Algorithms” by Peter A. Whigham, Grant Dick, and James Maclaurin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver