A review and comparison of hybrid and pull-type production control strategies

John Geraghty, Cathal Heavey

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

In order to overcome the disadvantages of Kanban Control Strategy (KCS) in non-repetitive manufacturing environments, two research approaches have been followed in the literature in past two decades. The first approach has been concerned with developing new, or combining existing, pull-type production control strategies in order to maximise the benefits of pull control while increasing the ability of a production system to satisfy demand. The second approach has focused on how best to combine Just-In-Time (JIT) and Material-Requirements-Planning (MRP) philosophies in order to maximise the benefits of pull control in non-repetitive manufacturing environments. This paper provides a review of the research activities in these two approaches, presents a comparison between a Production Control Strategy (PCS) from each approach, and presents a comparison of the performance of several pull-type production control strategies in addressing the Service Level vs. WIP trade-off in an environment with low variability and a light-to-medium demand load.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationStochastic Modeling of Manufacturing Systems
Subtitle of host publicationAdvances in Design, Performance Evaluation, and Control Issues
PublisherSpringer Berlin Heidelberg
Pages307-329
Number of pages23
ISBN (Print)3540265791, 9783540265795
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Keywords

  • BSCS
  • CONWIP/Pull
  • Discrete event simulation
  • EKCS
  • Hybrid Push/Pull
  • Kanban
  • Markov decision process
  • Simulated annealing optimization algorithm

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A review and comparison of hybrid and pull-type production control strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this