A simple consensus approach improves somatic mutation prediction accuracy

David L. Goode, Sally M. Hunter, Maria A. Doyle, Tao Ma, Simone M. Rowley, David Choong, Georgina L. Ryland, Ian G. Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Differentiating true somatic mutations from artifacts in massively parallel sequencing data is an immense challenge. To develop methods for optimal somatic mutation detection and to identify factors influencing somatic mutation prediction accuracy, we validated predictions from three somatic mutation detection algorithms, MuTect, JointSNVMix2 and SomaticSniper, by Sanger sequencing. Full consensus predictions had a validation rate of >98%, but some partial consensus predictions validated too. In cases of partial consensus, read depth and mapping quality data, along with additional prediction methods, aided in removing inaccurate predictions. Our consensus approach is fast, flexible and provides a high-confidence list of putative somatic mutations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number90
JournalGenome Medicine
Volume5
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Sep 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A simple consensus approach improves somatic mutation prediction accuracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this