TY - JOUR
T1 - A systematic review identifying personally modifiable factors for self-harm recovery in young people and the barriers and facilitators to their implementation
AU - McEvoy, David
AU - Sweeney, Colm
AU - Ryan, Leona
AU - Wilson, Caroline
AU - Healy, Colm
AU - Mongan, David
AU - Sheaf, Greg
AU - Higgins, Agnes
AU - Gallant, Allyson J.
AU - Doyle, Louise
AU - Darker, Catherine D.
AU - Keogh, Brian
AU - Kartalova-O'Doherty, Yulia
AU - Murphy, Rebecca
AU - Fitzgerald, Christine
AU - Staines, Lorna
AU - Lyne, John Paul
AU - O'Connor, Karen
AU - Anand-Vembar, Shaakya
AU - O'Keeffe, Donal
AU - Nic Aodha, Caoimhe
AU - Cannon, Mary
AU - Donohoe, Gary
AU - Longe, Olivia
AU - McDonald, Colm
AU - Burke, Sara
AU - Breen, Oisin
AU - Thomas, Robyn
AU - Doody, Michelle
AU - Cotter, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
PY - 2026/5
Y1 - 2026/5
N2 - IntroductionWhile research has extensively examined self-harm prevention and risk factors, fewer studies have explored recovery processes. Personally modifiable factors — lifestyle, skill-based, or behavioural aspects an individual can influence — may support self-harm recovery. This review aimed to identify these factors for young people and, secondarily, the barriers and facilitators affecting their implementation.MethodsRecovery was defined symptomatically (reduction or cessation of self-harm) and personally, using the CHIME framework (Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning, Empowerment). Five databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Embase, Web of Science) were searched in February 2025. Inductive coding identified personally modifiable factors, and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided analysis of barriers and facilitators.ResultsFrom 16,900 screened records, 35 studies were included. Common factors for symptom-based recovery (ceasing self-harm) included activities or hobbies (such as exercise, art, or music), social engagement with friends/family, harm minimisation techniques (e.g., holding ice cubes, elastic bands), and distraction methods. Online engagement and harm minimisation were double-edged, offering support but sometimes posing risks. Online forums fostered connectedness and empowerment, and recovery stories promoted hope (i.e. personal recovery). Barriers and facilitators varied; stigma often hindered offline discussion but encouraged anonymous online support.ConclusionsYoung people identify diverse, personally modifiable factors that guide self-harm recovery alone or with support. These factors are context- and person-dependent, underscoring the need for flexible, individualized approaches. Future research should also include low- and middle-income countries and include stratified analyses by sex and gender to capture a broader range of experiences and recovery pathways.
AB - IntroductionWhile research has extensively examined self-harm prevention and risk factors, fewer studies have explored recovery processes. Personally modifiable factors — lifestyle, skill-based, or behavioural aspects an individual can influence — may support self-harm recovery. This review aimed to identify these factors for young people and, secondarily, the barriers and facilitators affecting their implementation.MethodsRecovery was defined symptomatically (reduction or cessation of self-harm) and personally, using the CHIME framework (Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning, Empowerment). Five databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Embase, Web of Science) were searched in February 2025. Inductive coding identified personally modifiable factors, and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided analysis of barriers and facilitators.ResultsFrom 16,900 screened records, 35 studies were included. Common factors for symptom-based recovery (ceasing self-harm) included activities or hobbies (such as exercise, art, or music), social engagement with friends/family, harm minimisation techniques (e.g., holding ice cubes, elastic bands), and distraction methods. Online engagement and harm minimisation were double-edged, offering support but sometimes posing risks. Online forums fostered connectedness and empowerment, and recovery stories promoted hope (i.e. personal recovery). Barriers and facilitators varied; stigma often hindered offline discussion but encouraged anonymous online support.ConclusionsYoung people identify diverse, personally modifiable factors that guide self-harm recovery alone or with support. These factors are context- and person-dependent, underscoring the need for flexible, individualized approaches. Future research should also include low- and middle-income countries and include stratified analyses by sex and gender to capture a broader range of experiences and recovery pathways.
KW - Adolescents
KW - Barriers
KW - Facilitators
KW - Mental health recovery
KW - Personally modifiable factor
KW - Review
KW - Self-harm
KW - Self-injury
KW - Suicide
KW - Young people
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105032686520
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2026.02.027
DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2026.02.027
M3 - Review article
C2 - 41713173
AN - SCOPUS:105032686520
SN - 0022-3956
VL - 196
SP - 210
EP - 233
JO - Journal of Psychiatric Research
JF - Journal of Psychiatric Research
ER -