Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A systematic review identifying personally modifiable factors for self-harm recovery in young people and the barriers and facilitators to their implementation

  • David McEvoy
  • , Colm Sweeney
  • , Leona Ryan
  • , Caroline Wilson
  • , Colm Healy
  • , David Mongan
  • , Greg Sheaf
  • , Agnes Higgins
  • , Allyson J. Gallant
  • , Louise Doyle
  • , Catherine D. Darker
  • , Brian Keogh
  • , Yulia Kartalova-O'Doherty
  • , Rebecca Murphy
  • , Christine Fitzgerald
  • , Lorna Staines
  • , John Paul Lyne
  • , Karen O'Connor
  • , Shaakya Anand-Vembar
  • , Donal O'Keeffe
  • Caoimhe Nic Aodha, Mary Cannon, Gary Donohoe, Olivia Longe, Colm McDonald, Sara Burke, Oisin Breen, Robyn Thomas, Michelle Doody, David Cotter
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
  • University of Galway
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Trinity College Dublin
  • Dublin City University
  • University College Cork
  • Mental Health Ireland
  • Breen Craft Ltd
  • University of Amsterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

IntroductionWhile research has extensively examined self-harm prevention and risk factors, fewer studies have explored recovery processes. Personally modifiable factors — lifestyle, skill-based, or behavioural aspects an individual can influence — may support self-harm recovery. This review aimed to identify these factors for young people and, secondarily, the barriers and facilitators affecting their implementation.MethodsRecovery was defined symptomatically (reduction or cessation of self-harm) and personally, using the CHIME framework (Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning, Empowerment). Five databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Embase, Web of Science) were searched in February 2025. Inductive coding identified personally modifiable factors, and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided analysis of barriers and facilitators.ResultsFrom 16,900 screened records, 35 studies were included. Common factors for symptom-based recovery (ceasing self-harm) included activities or hobbies (such as exercise, art, or music), social engagement with friends/family, harm minimisation techniques (e.g., holding ice cubes, elastic bands), and distraction methods. Online engagement and harm minimisation were double-edged, offering support but sometimes posing risks. Online forums fostered connectedness and empowerment, and recovery stories promoted hope (i.e. personal recovery). Barriers and facilitators varied; stigma often hindered offline discussion but encouraged anonymous online support.ConclusionsYoung people identify diverse, personally modifiable factors that guide self-harm recovery alone or with support. These factors are context- and person-dependent, underscoring the need for flexible, individualized approaches. Future research should also include low- and middle-income countries and include stratified analyses by sex and gender to capture a broader range of experiences and recovery pathways.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)210-233
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Psychiatric Research
Volume196
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Barriers
  • Facilitators
  • Mental health recovery
  • Personally modifiable factor
  • Review
  • Self-harm
  • Self-injury
  • Suicide
  • Young people

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic review identifying personally modifiable factors for self-harm recovery in young people and the barriers and facilitators to their implementation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this