TY - JOUR
T1 - Abnormal glucose tolerance post-gestational diabetes mellitus as defined by the International Association of diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria
AU - Noctor, Eoin
AU - Crowe, Catherine
AU - Carmody, Louise A.
AU - Saunders, Jean A.
AU - Kirwan, Breda
AU - O'Dea, Angela
AU - Gillespie, Paddy
AU - Glynn, Liam G.
AU - McGuire, Brian E.
AU - O'Neill, Ciaran
AU - O'Shea, P. M.
AU - Dunne, F. P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 European Society of Endocrinology Printed in Great Britain.
PY - 2016/10
Y1 - 2016/10
N2 - Objective: An increase in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevalence has been demonstrated across many countries with adoption of the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria. Here, we determine the cumulative incidence of abnormal glucose tolerance among women with previous GDM, and identify clinical risk factors predicting this. Design: Two hundred and seventy women with previous IADPSG-defined GDM were prospectively followed up for 5 years (mean 2.6) post-index pregnancy, and compared with 388 women with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) in pregnancy. Methods: Cumulative incidence of abnormal glucose tolerance (using American Diabetes Association criteria for impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method of survival analysis. Cox regression models were constructed to test for factors predicting abnormal glucose tolerance. Results: Twenty-six percent of women with previous GDM had abnormal glucose tolerance vs 4% with NGT, with the log-rank test demonstrating significantly different survival curves (P < 0.001). Women meeting IADPSG, but not the World Health Organization (WHO) 1999 criteria, had a lower cumulative incidence than women meeting both sets of criteria, both in the early post-partum period (4.2% vs 21.7%, P < 0.001) and at longer-term follow-up (13.7% vs 32.6%, P < 0.001). Predictive factors were glucose levels on the pregnancy oral glucose tolerance test, family history of diabetes, gestational week at testing, and BMI at follow-up. Conclusions: The proportion of women developing abnormal glucose tolerance remains high among those with IADPSG-defined GDM. This demonstrates the need for continued close follow-up, although the optimal frequency and method needs further study.
AB - Objective: An increase in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevalence has been demonstrated across many countries with adoption of the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria. Here, we determine the cumulative incidence of abnormal glucose tolerance among women with previous GDM, and identify clinical risk factors predicting this. Design: Two hundred and seventy women with previous IADPSG-defined GDM were prospectively followed up for 5 years (mean 2.6) post-index pregnancy, and compared with 388 women with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) in pregnancy. Methods: Cumulative incidence of abnormal glucose tolerance (using American Diabetes Association criteria for impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method of survival analysis. Cox regression models were constructed to test for factors predicting abnormal glucose tolerance. Results: Twenty-six percent of women with previous GDM had abnormal glucose tolerance vs 4% with NGT, with the log-rank test demonstrating significantly different survival curves (P < 0.001). Women meeting IADPSG, but not the World Health Organization (WHO) 1999 criteria, had a lower cumulative incidence than women meeting both sets of criteria, both in the early post-partum period (4.2% vs 21.7%, P < 0.001) and at longer-term follow-up (13.7% vs 32.6%, P < 0.001). Predictive factors were glucose levels on the pregnancy oral glucose tolerance test, family history of diabetes, gestational week at testing, and BMI at follow-up. Conclusions: The proportion of women developing abnormal glucose tolerance remains high among those with IADPSG-defined GDM. This demonstrates the need for continued close follow-up, although the optimal frequency and method needs further study.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990058383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1530/EJE-15-1260
DO - 10.1530/EJE-15-1260
M3 - Article
C2 - 27422889
AN - SCOPUS:84990058383
SN - 0804-4643
VL - 175
SP - 287
EP - 297
JO - European Journal of Endocrinology
JF - European Journal of Endocrinology
IS - 4
ER -