Accommodating field-dependence: A cross-over study

Adrian Parkinson, James A. Redmond, Cathal Walsh

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

In a previous study, it was found that field-independent learners performed significantly better than field-dependent learners in a web based and in a computerised text-based environment. It was decided to adapt both a web interface and a traditional text to accommodate the Field-dependent learner so as to try to reduce the disparity in performance with Field-independents. Seventy Information Systems students were initially assessed for Field-dependence/Field-independence cognitive style using the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT). The group of students was divided up randomly into two halves. In Session one, group 1 studied using a Web interface Modules 1 - 9 of an Introductory Course in Artificial Intelligence. Group 2 studied the same material in hard copy form only (Text). All studied the material for one hour per week for six weeks. They were then assessed in a one-hour exam. After a period of 7 weeks, in Session 2, Group 1 studied Modules 10-18 using Text while group two studied the same material using the Web interface. The results showed that the performance of Field-dependent individuals, be it in text or web, to be comparable to Field-independents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)72-76
Number of pages5
JournalACM SIGCSE Bulletin
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2004
Externally publishedYes
EventITiCSE 2004 - 9th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education - Leeds, United Kingdom
Duration: 28 Jul 200430 Jul 2004

Keywords

  • Cognitive Styles
  • Cross-over design
  • Experimentation
  • Field-dependent
  • Field-independent
  • GEFT
  • Human Factors
  • Interface Design
  • Learning Performance
  • Measurement
  • Performance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accommodating field-dependence: A cross-over study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this