Abstract
In a previous study, it was found that field-independent learners performed significantly better than field-dependent learners in a web based and in a computerised text-based environment. It was decided to adapt both a web interface and a traditional text to accommodate the Field-dependent learner so as to try to reduce the disparity in performance with Field-independents. Seventy Information Systems students were initially assessed for Field-dependence/Field-independence cognitive style using the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT). The group of students was divided up randomly into two halves. In Session one, group 1 studied using a Web interface Modules 1 - 9 of an Introductory Course in Artificial Intelligence. Group 2 studied the same material in hard copy form only (Text). All studied the material for one hour per week for six weeks. They were then assessed in a one-hour exam. After a period of 7 weeks, in Session 2, Group 1 studied Modules 10-18 using Text while group two studied the same material using the Web interface. The results showed that the performance of Field-dependent individuals, be it in text or web, to be comparable to Field-independents.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 72-76 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | ACM SIGCSE Bulletin |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sep 2004 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | ITiCSE 2004 - 9th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education - Leeds, United Kingdom Duration: 28 Jul 2004 → 30 Jul 2004 |
Keywords
- Cognitive Styles
- Cross-over design
- Experimentation
- Field-dependent
- Field-independent
- GEFT
- Human Factors
- Interface Design
- Learning Performance
- Measurement
- Performance