Additional thoughts on conversational and motivational sources of the dilution effect

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In a recent article, Igou and Bless (2005) presented evidence that the "dilution effect" (e.g., Nisbett, Zukier, & Lemley, 1981) is based on adherence to a conversational rule (maxim of relation; Grice, 1975). Kemmelmeier (2007) challenges this conclusion, arguing instead for a motivational explanation for the dilution effect. This response addresses Kemmelmeier's critique of Igou and Bless's research and illustrates limitations to his motivational approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-68
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Language and Social Psychology
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Dilution effect
  • Logic of conversation
  • Processing motivation

Cite this