Abstract
In a recent article, Igou and Bless (2005) presented evidence that the "dilution effect" (e.g., Nisbett, Zukier, & Lemley, 1981) is based on adherence to a conversational rule (maxim of relation; Grice, 1975). Kemmelmeier (2007) challenges this conclusion, arguing instead for a motivational explanation for the dilution effect. This response addresses Kemmelmeier's critique of Igou and Bless's research and illustrates limitations to his motivational approach.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 61-68 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Journal of Language and Social Psychology |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2007 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Dilution effect
- Logic of conversation
- Processing motivation