Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Advancing engagement of people with lived experience of stroke in recovery and rehabilitation research: Consensus-based core recommendations from the fourth Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable

  • Elizabeth A. Lynch
  • , Felicity A.S. Bright
  • , Saran Chamberlain
  • , Adewale Adebajo
  • , Pauline Campbell
  • , Donna T. Chen
  • , Coralie K. English
  • , Ian D. Graham
  • , Jytte Isaksen
  • , Molly X. Manning
  • , Sidhiprada Mohapatra
  • , Michelle Nelson
  • , Katie Nesbitt
  • , Torsten Rackoll
  • , Shamala Thilarajah
  • , Steven Zeiler
  • , Lisa Kidd
  • Caring Futures Institute
  • Auckland University of Technology
  • Glasgow Caledonian University
  • University of Virginia
  • University of Newcastle
  • Hunter Medical Research Institute, Australia
  • University of Sydney
  • University of Ottawa
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Manipal Academy of Higher Education
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • Singapore General Hospital
  • Singapore Institute of Technology
  • Johns Hopkins University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Rationale: There is a growing recognition of the importance of engaging with people with lived experience (PWLE) to support research relevance and impact. However, there is little specific guidance for stroke recovery and rehabilitation researchers about how best to engage with PWLE of stroke in research, who face additional barriers to engaging due to common post-stroke sequelae including communication and cognitive difficulties, sensory and perceptual impairments, emotional wellbeing, and fatigue. The aim of this roundtable was to develop recommendations to support researchers to engage with PWLE of stroke in primary and secondary research conducted in laboratory, clinical, health system, or community settings. Methods: We convened an interdisciplinary, international taskforce comprising researchers and lived experience experts (n = 16) to create recommendations to support researchers to engage with PWLE of stroke meaningfully and respectfully. Guided by priorities and key gaps identified by taskforce members, and underpinned by gray and published literature, we formed discrete workgroups to develop consensus-based recommendations and guidance documents addressing common barriers to engagement in stroke research. The recommendations and guides were reviewed, and consensus was reached during a 2-day hybrid in-person/online meeting of the taskforce. These were further refined through consultation with international experts in research engagement. Results: We created the EMBED (Engaging Meaningfully to Build research with people with lived experience to drive improvements in stroke research) framework, consisting of five consensus recommendations: Select the engagement approach; Identify people to engage with; Embed accessible and inclusive ways of working; Support and strengthen accessibility and inclusivity; and Report accessibility and inclusivity. Ten guidance documents provide practical support to researchers to engage with PWLE of stroke in all research settings. Conclusions: The EMBED framework provides researchers with pragmatic and structured support to engage with PWLE in stroke research.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Stroke
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • consensus
  • lived experience
  • patient engagement
  • patient public involvement
  • recovery
  • rehabilitation
  • research engagement
  • Stroke

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Advancing engagement of people with lived experience of stroke in recovery and rehabilitation research: Consensus-based core recommendations from the fourth Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this