Age discrimination: Potential for adverse impact and differential prediction related to age

Gwenith G. Fisher, Donald M. Truxillo, Lisa M. Finkelstein, Lauren E. Wallace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The proportion of workers in their 50s, 60s, and 70s is larger than ever before. Current workforce trends indicate global increases in retirement ages and that many individuals are working until later ages than in decades past, and older people are applying for jobs and at later ages. Research to date on age discrimination in selection has focused primarily on disparate treatment or intentional discrimination. However, based on accumulated knowledge about age-related changes in cognitive and physical abilities as well as changes in personality and work motivation across the life course, we suggest that more attention be paid to the possibility of age-based subgroup differences on selection procedures, manifested as adverse impact and differential prediction. We provide recommendations to guide future human resource management research and practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)316-327
Number of pages12
JournalHuman Resource Management Review
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Adverse impact
  • Age
  • Cognitive ability
  • Differential prediction
  • Disparate impact
  • Measurement bias
  • Personality
  • Personnel selection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Age discrimination: Potential for adverse impact and differential prediction related to age'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this