Agendas, influences, and capability: Perspectives on practice in design and technology education

Andrew Doyle, Niall Seery, Donal Canty, Jeffrey Buckley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A philosophical shift in policy now situates the development of technological capability as the focus of Irish technology education. Internationally, the effectiveness of curricular reform in the discipline has previously been called to question, as the legacy of the preceding vocational craft subjects has been seen to throttle the evolution of practice in aligning with emergent policy. As Irish technology education shares this vocational heritage, this research seeks to explore the effectiveness of policy change through an investigation of current practices in the discipline. Specifically, this research seeks to explore the alignment of teachers’ perceptions of practice in terms of the focus of learning activities and educational outcomes as prescribed by curricula. A methodological framework was developed to explore teachers’ (n = 15) perceptions, ecologically rooted in the tasks and activities they use to teach in their classrooms. The results suggest a misalignment between what teachers conceive as important to the discipline, and their enacted practices. The paper unpacks the contentions surrounding this misalignment and discusses factors which appear to influence teachers’ perceptions, forming a greater understanding of what influences practice in the discipline.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-159
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Technology and Design Education
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • Influences on practice
  • Perceptions of practice
  • Technological capability
  • Technology education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Agendas, influences, and capability: Perspectives on practice in design and technology education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this