Alternative access sites

Bing Wei Thaddeus Soh, Eoin Fahy, Thomas Kiernan, Samer Arnous

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

While transradial access remains the default approach, alternative access sites should be considered in situations encountering challenging anatomical variants (radial loops, tortuosity, and high take-off), non-palpable radial arteries, radial artery vasospasm, or where large-bore access is required. Crossover to the contralateral left radial artery should be considered before crossover to transfemoral access due to improved safety, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness of transradial compared to transfemoral access [1, 2]. Furthermore, transulnar has been shown to be non-inferior to transradial access and therefore should also be considered before attempting crossover to the transfemoral approach [3-5]. However, transfemoral access remains an important alternative access site for procedures performed within the catheter laboratory [6, 7], and all interventionalists should retain proficiency in the technique to reduce the risk of complications in situations where its use is mandated [8]. As a last resort, transbrachial access can be performed either percutaneously or via arterial cutdown to the brachial artery if other access options are not available [9-11].

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Transradial Handbook
Subtitle of host publicationEvidence-based Practice
PublisherCRC Press
Pages115-128
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9781040253373
ISBN (Print)9780367721428
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2025
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Alternative access sites'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this