Abstract
Objective: To review our experience of a non-selective policy for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm to see if the policy was justified, and to identify any preoperative risk factors that adversely influenced outcome. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Teaching hospital, Republic of Ireland. Subjects: 258 patients admitted with abdominal aortic aneurysms between January 1982 and December 1993. Interventions: Definitive surgical treatment. Main outcome measures: Morbidity, mortality, and risk factors. Results: In-hospital mortality for all patients was 43% (110/258). Overall, women did worse than men (28/44, 64%, died, compared with 96/214, 45%, p = 0.03). The mortality among patients over the age of 80 (23/45, 51%) was not significantly different from that among younger patients (97/202, 48%). Blood pressure, platelet count, and haemoglobin concentration were all significantly lower preoperatively among those who died (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Age alone cannot be used to justify witholding definitive surgical treatment. Treatment should be aimed towards reversing haematological and haemodynamic abnormalities preoperatively to try to improve outcome.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 263-270 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | European Journal of Surgery |
| Volume | 164 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1998 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Age
- Mortality
- Renal failure
- Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An 'all comers' policy for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: How can results be improved?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver