An empirical study of user preference and performance with UML diagrams

C. Britton, M. Kutar, S. Anthony, T. Barker, Sarah Beecham, Vitoria Wilkinson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Elicitation and validation of user requirements depend, to a large extent, on the effectiveness of the tools and techniques used as a vehicle for discussion between developers and users during the requirements process. This effectiveness may, in turn, be influenced by user preference for a particular approach or requirements technique. This paper describes a study that was carried out to investigate the relationship between user preference for sequence or collaboration diagrams in UML, with their accuracy in understanding information contained in the diagrams. Results showed that user preference for one of the two diagram types before carrying out the task was not reflected in improved performance with that type of diagram compared with the other. However, after carrying out the task, user statements about which type of diagram they preferred working with were matched by improved performance with that type of diagram.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - IEEE 2002 Symposia on Human Centric Computing Languages and Environments, HCC 2002
Pages31-33
Number of pages3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes
Event2002 IEEE Symposia on Human Centric Computing Languages and Environments, HCC 2002 - Toronto, ON, Canada
Duration: 3 Sep 20026 Sep 2002

Publication series

NameProceedings - IEEE 2002 Symposia on Human Centric Computing Languages and Environments, HCC 2002

Conference

Conference2002 IEEE Symposia on Human Centric Computing Languages and Environments, HCC 2002
Country/TerritoryCanada
CityToronto, ON
Period3/09/026/09/02

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An empirical study of user preference and performance with UML diagrams'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this