TY - JOUR
T1 - An Inquiry into the Accessibility of Campus Recreation for College Students with Disabilities
AU - Abrahamson, Kayla
AU - Ross-Cypcar, Samantha
AU - Healy, Sean
AU - Sherfinski, Melissa
AU - Elliott, Eloise
AU - Taliaferro, Andrea
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - University recreation centers are essential for college student physical activity, yet 68% of students with disabilities (SWD) use these facilities fewer than five times annually. Physical and programmatic barriers, including physical access and program inclusivity, may limit SWD participation. This study evaluated the accessibility of three campus recreation facilities at southeastern U.S. public universities using the AIMFREE assessment and interviews with campus recreation directors and staff. Results showed below-average accessibility (<50%) across half of AIMFREE sections, with policies, access routes, and professional training scoring the lowest (7–35%). Interviews revealed gaps in funding allocation, limited adapted programming, and insufficient inclusive marketing efforts. Staff also cited a lack of knowledge, training, and resources as significant barriers but expressed a commitment to addressing these challenges. Findings emphasize the need for tailored training programs that address the unique environmental and cultural contexts of campus recreation to improve accessibility and inclusivity for SWD.
AB - University recreation centers are essential for college student physical activity, yet 68% of students with disabilities (SWD) use these facilities fewer than five times annually. Physical and programmatic barriers, including physical access and program inclusivity, may limit SWD participation. This study evaluated the accessibility of three campus recreation facilities at southeastern U.S. public universities using the AIMFREE assessment and interviews with campus recreation directors and staff. Results showed below-average accessibility (<50%) across half of AIMFREE sections, with policies, access routes, and professional training scoring the lowest (7–35%). Interviews revealed gaps in funding allocation, limited adapted programming, and insufficient inclusive marketing efforts. Staff also cited a lack of knowledge, training, and resources as significant barriers but expressed a commitment to addressing these challenges. Findings emphasize the need for tailored training programs that address the unique environmental and cultural contexts of campus recreation to improve accessibility and inclusivity for SWD.
KW - accessibility
KW - Campus recreation
KW - disability
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105014803620
U2 - 10.1177/15588661251372108
DO - 10.1177/15588661251372108
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105014803620
SN - 1558-8661
VL - 49
SP - 209
EP - 222
JO - Recreational Sports Journal
JF - Recreational Sports Journal
IS - 2
ER -