An international estimate of the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities

David J. Wright, Matthew W. Scott, Sarah N. Kraeutner, Pamela Barhoun, Maurizio Bertollo, Mark J. Campbell, Baptiste M. Waltzing, Stephan F. Dahm, Maaike Esselaar, Cornelia Frank, Robert M. Hardwick, Ian Fuelscher, Ben Marshall, Nicola J. Hodges, Christian Hyde, Paul S. Holmes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The aim of this research was to establish prevalence estimates for aphantasia, hypophantasia, typical imagery ability, and hyperphantasia in a large multi-national cohort. In Study 1, the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire was completed by 3,049 participants. Results indicated prevalence estimates of 1.2% for aphantasia, 3% for hypophantasia, 89.9% for typical imagery ability, and 5.9% for hyperphantasia. In Study 2, to replicate these findings in a larger sample, the Study 1 data were combined with openly available data from previous prevalence studies to create a total sample of 9,063 participants. Re-analysis of this data confirmed prevalence estimates of 0.9% for aphantasia, 3.3% for hypophantasia, 89.7% for typical imagery ability, and 6.1% for hyperphantasia. These robust and up-to-date estimates provide enhanced clarity to researchers regarding the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities and provide a platform for future studies exploring the role of visual imagery in various cognitive and behavioral tasks.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1454107
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • aphantasia
  • hyperphantasia
  • hypophantasia
  • imagery ability
  • visual imagery
  • VVIQ

Cite this