An international estimate of the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities

  • David J. Wright
  • , Matthew W. Scott
  • , Sarah N. Kraeutner
  • , Pamela Barhoun
  • , Maurizio Bertollo
  • , Mark J. Campbell
  • , Baptiste M. Waltzing
  • , Stephan F. Dahm
  • , Maaike Esselaar
  • , Cornelia Frank
  • , Robert M. Hardwick
  • , Ian Fuelscher
  • , Ben Marshall
  • , Nicola J. Hodges
  • , Christian Hyde
  • , Paul S. Holmes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The aim of this research was to establish prevalence estimates for aphantasia, hypophantasia, typical imagery ability, and hyperphantasia in a large multi-national cohort. In Study 1, the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire was completed by 3,049 participants. Results indicated prevalence estimates of 1.2% for aphantasia, 3% for hypophantasia, 89.9% for typical imagery ability, and 5.9% for hyperphantasia. In Study 2, to replicate these findings in a larger sample, the Study 1 data were combined with openly available data from previous prevalence studies to create a total sample of 9,063 participants. Re-analysis of this data confirmed prevalence estimates of 0.9% for aphantasia, 3.3% for hypophantasia, 89.7% for typical imagery ability, and 6.1% for hyperphantasia. These robust and up-to-date estimates provide enhanced clarity to researchers regarding the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities and provide a platform for future studies exploring the role of visual imagery in various cognitive and behavioral tasks.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1454107
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • VVIQ
  • aphantasia
  • hyperphantasia
  • hypophantasia
  • imagery ability
  • visual imagery

Cite this