TY - JOUR
T1 - An International Multicenter Cohort Study on β-Blockers for the Treatment of Symptomatic Children With Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia
AU - Peltenburg, Puck J.
AU - Kallas, Dania
AU - Bos, Johan M.
AU - Lieve, Krystien V.V.
AU - Franciosi, Sonia
AU - Roston, Thomas M.
AU - Denjoy, Isabelle
AU - Sorensen, Katrina B.
AU - Ohno, Seiko
AU - Roses-Noguer, Ferran
AU - Aiba, Takeshi
AU - Maltret, Alice
AU - Lapage, Martin J.
AU - Atallah, Joseph
AU - Giudicessi, John R.
AU - Clur, Sally Ann B.
AU - Blom, Nico A.
AU - Tanck, Michael
AU - Extramiana, Fabrice
AU - Kato, Koichi
AU - Barc, Julien
AU - Borggrefe, Martin
AU - Behr, Elijah R.
AU - Sarquella-Brugada, Georgia
AU - Tfelt-Hansen, Jacob
AU - Zorio, Esther
AU - Swan, Heikki
AU - Kammeraad, Janneke A.E.
AU - Krahn, Andrew D.
AU - Davis, Andrew
AU - Sacher, Frederic
AU - Schwartz, Peter J.
AU - Roberts, Jason D.
AU - Skinner, Jonathan R.
AU - Van Den Berg, Maarten P.
AU - Kannankeril, Prince J.
AU - Drago, Fabrizio
AU - Robyns, Tomas
AU - Haugaa, Kristina
AU - Tavacova, Terezia
AU - Semsarian, Christopher
AU - Till, Jan
AU - Probst, Vincent
AU - Brugada, Ramon
AU - Shimizu, Wataru
AU - Horie, Minoru
AU - Leenhardt, Antoine
AU - Ackerman, Michael J.
AU - Sanatani, Shubhayan
AU - Van Der Werf, Christian
AU - Wilde, Arthur A.M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/2/1
Y1 - 2022/2/1
N2 - Background: Symptomatic children with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) are at risk for recurrent arrhythmic events. β-Blockers decrease this risk, but studies comparing individual β-blockers in sizeable cohorts are lacking. We aimed to assess the association between risk for arrhythmic events and type of β-blocker in a large cohort of symptomatic children with CPVT. Methods: From 2 international registries of patients with CPVT, RYR2 variant-carrying symptomatic children (defined as syncope or sudden cardiac arrest before β-blocker initiation and age at start of β-blocker therapy <18 years), treated with a β-blocker were included. Cox regression analyses with time-dependent covariates for β-blockers and potential confounders were used to assess the hazard ratio (HR). The primary outcome was the first occurrence of sudden cardiac death, sudden cardiac arrest, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, or syncope. The secondary outcome was the first occurrence of any of the primary outcomes except syncope. Results: We included 329 patients (median age at diagnosis, 12 [interquartile range, 7-15] years, 35% females). Ninety-nine (30.1%) patients experienced the primary outcome and 74 (22.5%) experienced the secondary outcome during a median follow-up of 6.7 (interquartile range, 2.8-12.5) years. Two-hundred sixteen patients (66.0%) used a nonselective β-blocker (predominantly nadolol [n=140] or propranolol [n=70]) and 111 (33.7%) used a β1-selective β-blocker (predominantly atenolol [n=51], metoprolol [n=33], or bisoprolol [n=19]) as initial β-blocker. Baseline characteristics did not differ. The HRs for both the primary and secondary outcomes were higher for β1-selective compared with nonselective β-blockers (HR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.31-3.17]; and HR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.20-3.30], respectively). When assessed separately, the HR for the primary outcome was higher for atenolol (HR, 2.68 [95% CI, 1.44-4.99]), bisoprolol (HR, 3.24 [95% CI, 1.47-7.18]), and metoprolol (HR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.08-4.40]) compared with nadolol, but did not differ from propranolol. The HR of the secondary outcome was only higher in atenolol compared with nadolol (HR, 2.68 [95% CI, 1.30-5.55]). Conclusions: β1-selective β-blockers were associated with a significantly higher risk for arrhythmic events in symptomatic children with CPVT compared with nonselective β-blockers, specifically nadolol. Nadolol, or propranolol if nadolol is unavailable, should be the preferred β-blocker for treating symptomatic children with CPVT.
AB - Background: Symptomatic children with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) are at risk for recurrent arrhythmic events. β-Blockers decrease this risk, but studies comparing individual β-blockers in sizeable cohorts are lacking. We aimed to assess the association between risk for arrhythmic events and type of β-blocker in a large cohort of symptomatic children with CPVT. Methods: From 2 international registries of patients with CPVT, RYR2 variant-carrying symptomatic children (defined as syncope or sudden cardiac arrest before β-blocker initiation and age at start of β-blocker therapy <18 years), treated with a β-blocker were included. Cox regression analyses with time-dependent covariates for β-blockers and potential confounders were used to assess the hazard ratio (HR). The primary outcome was the first occurrence of sudden cardiac death, sudden cardiac arrest, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, or syncope. The secondary outcome was the first occurrence of any of the primary outcomes except syncope. Results: We included 329 patients (median age at diagnosis, 12 [interquartile range, 7-15] years, 35% females). Ninety-nine (30.1%) patients experienced the primary outcome and 74 (22.5%) experienced the secondary outcome during a median follow-up of 6.7 (interquartile range, 2.8-12.5) years. Two-hundred sixteen patients (66.0%) used a nonselective β-blocker (predominantly nadolol [n=140] or propranolol [n=70]) and 111 (33.7%) used a β1-selective β-blocker (predominantly atenolol [n=51], metoprolol [n=33], or bisoprolol [n=19]) as initial β-blocker. Baseline characteristics did not differ. The HRs for both the primary and secondary outcomes were higher for β1-selective compared with nonselective β-blockers (HR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.31-3.17]; and HR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.20-3.30], respectively). When assessed separately, the HR for the primary outcome was higher for atenolol (HR, 2.68 [95% CI, 1.44-4.99]), bisoprolol (HR, 3.24 [95% CI, 1.47-7.18]), and metoprolol (HR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.08-4.40]) compared with nadolol, but did not differ from propranolol. The HR of the secondary outcome was only higher in atenolol compared with nadolol (HR, 2.68 [95% CI, 1.30-5.55]). Conclusions: β1-selective β-blockers were associated with a significantly higher risk for arrhythmic events in symptomatic children with CPVT compared with nonselective β-blockers, specifically nadolol. Nadolol, or propranolol if nadolol is unavailable, should be the preferred β-blocker for treating symptomatic children with CPVT.
KW - atenolol
KW - child
KW - death, sudden, cardiac
KW - metoprolol
KW - nadolol
KW - polymorphic catecholergic ventricular tachycardia
KW - propranolol
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123968702&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056018
DO - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056018
M3 - Article
C2 - 34874747
AN - SCOPUS:85123968702
SN - 0009-7322
VL - 145
SP - 333
EP - 344
JO - Circulation
JF - Circulation
IS - 5
ER -