TY - JOUR
T1 - Are We Practicing What We Preach? Family Partnership in Therapeutic Residential Care for Children and Youth
AU - Herbell, Kayla
AU - McNamara, Patricia
AU - Cresswell, Caroline
AU - Price, Matt
AU - Sweeney, Millie
AU - Bellonci, Christopher
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This study presents a tiered conceptualization of family partnership developed by the Family-Run Executive Director Leadership Association (FREDLA) with examples of strategies from the literature. This sub-study was part of an overarching systematic review project that aimed to review the literature on family partnership in relation to youth outcomes. The tiers of family partnership include family involvement (i.e. family’s inclusion in their child’s care); family engagement (i.e. collaboration between TRC and families); family-driven (i.e. families as full partners). This review included thirty studies (n = 23 family involvement, n = 7 family engagement, n = 0 family-driven). The most common family involvement methods were family therapy and family visits to the program, primarily, delivered face-to-face. The most common family engagement method was activities, therapies, and skill building occurring at the home with family present. Methods of measuring family partnership primarily included the use of administrative data. Implications for research and practice include the provision of research that evaluates the effects of family partnership on outcomes important in the TRC setting and the development of research-practice and family-research collaborations to increase the uptake of effective family partnering methods.
AB - This study presents a tiered conceptualization of family partnership developed by the Family-Run Executive Director Leadership Association (FREDLA) with examples of strategies from the literature. This sub-study was part of an overarching systematic review project that aimed to review the literature on family partnership in relation to youth outcomes. The tiers of family partnership include family involvement (i.e. family’s inclusion in their child’s care); family engagement (i.e. collaboration between TRC and families); family-driven (i.e. families as full partners). This review included thirty studies (n = 23 family involvement, n = 7 family engagement, n = 0 family-driven). The most common family involvement methods were family therapy and family visits to the program, primarily, delivered face-to-face. The most common family engagement method was activities, therapies, and skill building occurring at the home with family present. Methods of measuring family partnership primarily included the use of administrative data. Implications for research and practice include the provision of research that evaluates the effects of family partnership on outcomes important in the TRC setting and the development of research-practice and family-research collaborations to increase the uptake of effective family partnering methods.
KW - Family engagement
KW - family involvement
KW - residential care
KW - residential treatment
KW - youth
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161383303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0886571X.2023.2217530
DO - 10.1080/0886571X.2023.2217530
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85161383303
SN - 0886-571X
VL - 41
SP - 2
EP - 23
JO - Residential Treatment for Children and Youth
JF - Residential Treatment for Children and Youth
IS - 1
ER -