Aspiration, risk and risk feeding: A critique of the Royal College of Physicians guidance on care of people with eating and drinking difficulties

Shaun T. O'Keeffe, Aoife Murray, Paula Leslie, Lindsey Collins, Tracy Lazenby-Paterson, Arlene Mccurtin, Siofra Mulkerrin, Alison Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The Royal College of Physicians has recently published guidance on supporting people with eating and drinking difficulties. Although much of the advice in the guidance is sensible and helpful, in this paper we argue that the recommendations regarding 'risk feeding' decisions are flawed. In particular, there is a failure to clearly identify the nature, frequency and severity of different risks. There is an undue emphasis on aspiration as a risk and as a potential cause of pneumonia, and the limited evidence base for many interventions to manage risk is not adequately acknowledged. There is an emphasis on multidisciplinary team decision making at the expense of individual professional responsibility. We conclude that this guidance regarding risk feeding supports an unduly defensive approach to oral intake and should not be adopted as a standard of medical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-72
Number of pages10
JournalAdvances in Communication and Swallowing
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • aspiration
  • defensive medicine
  • Dysphagia
  • pneumonia
  • risk feeding

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aspiration, risk and risk feeding: A critique of the Royal College of Physicians guidance on care of people with eating and drinking difficulties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this