Assessing the role of the European Council and the European Commission during the migration and COVID-19 crises

David Moloney, Sebastiaan Princen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Over the past decades, ‘emergency politics’ has become a quasi-permanent feature of the European Union (EU). According to some, this has reinforced the trend towards a greater role for the European Council (EUCO) in EU agenda-setting, to the detriment of the European Commission (Commission). In this article, this claim is critically assessed by analysing two major crises: the 2015-2016 migration crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. By systematically tracing the various agenda-setting roles played by EU actors in these crises, two claims are made. First, using a more fine-grained typology of agenda-setting roles, the relationship between EUCO and the Commission is shown to be more nuanced than is often suggested. Second, EUCO and the Commission cannot be considered monolithic players. Instead, actors within these institutions operate outside of formal channels to purse their own policy goals. This puts in doubt the usefulness of focussing on the EUCO-Commission relationship in a purely inter-institutional sense.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1556-1587
Number of pages32
JournalWest European Politics
Volume47
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • 2015–2016 migration crisis
  • COVID-19 pandemic
  • European Commission
  • European Council
  • agenda-setting
  • emergency politics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the role of the European Council and the European Commission during the migration and COVID-19 crises'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this