Abstract
This study uses critical discourse analysis to examine news reporting of two cases of intimate partner violence in Australia. The fine-grained analysis of newswriting and news-editing practices focuses particularly on the lexical features and referential strategies used to represent the perpetrator and the victim, the crime, and the location of the crime. Findings show that reporting often omits social context, sensationalizes, and acts to shift blame in ways that do not increase public understanding of the nature of domestic violence. These results build on international findings and add to the evidence base about media reporting of violence against women.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 441-462 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Violence Against Women |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Australian media and intimate partner homicide
- Australian media and violence against women
- media and critical discourse analysis
- violence against women
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Australian Media Messages: Critical Discourse Analysis of Two Intimate Homicides Involving Domestic Violence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver