Bacterial communities in grassland turfs respond to sulphonate addition while fungal communities remain largely unchanged

Achim Schmalenberger, Matthias Noll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Sulphonates are often the major form of sulphur in soils where sulphate usually represents less than 5% of the total sulphur. The use of sulphonates as a S source is limited to a functional bacterial guild. However, fungi may assist bacteria in sulphonate desulphurization. In this study, grassland turfs were watered periodically with a modified Hoagland's solution that was i) sulphur free, ii) contained low molecular weight sulphonate iii) or high molecular weight sulphonate. DNA fingerprint analyses of fungal and bacterial communities revealed significant differences between the rhizosphere soil and the bulk soil. Sulphonate treatments had only significant effects on the bacterial and desulphonating bacterial communities and no significant effects on the fungal communities. However, sequencing of the fungal ITS region identified the presence of potentially endophytic fungi in sulphonate amended turfs. Analysis of the sulphur species in soil suggested that the added toluenesulphonate-sulphur was transformed despite the fact that the number of the desulphonating bacteria remained unchanged indicating no sulphonate limitation. The results showcase a robust fungal community in grassland turfs where only the bacterial community with its desulphonating bacterial guild is predominantly responding to the sulphonate amendment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12-19
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Soil Biology
Volume61
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

Keywords

  • AsfA
  • Desulfonation
  • Desulfurization
  • DGGE
  • Sulfonate
  • T-RFLP

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bacterial communities in grassland turfs respond to sulphonate addition while fungal communities remain largely unchanged'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this