Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Carotid revascularization immediately before urgent cardiac surgery: Practice patterns associated with the choice of carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy: A report from the CARE (Carotid Artery Revascularization and Endarterectomy) registry

  • Creighton W. Don
  • , John House
  • , Christopher White
  • , Thomas Kiernan
  • , Mary Weideman
  • , Nicholas Ruggiero
  • , Andrew McCann
  • , Kenneth Rosenfield
  • University of Washington
  • Saint Luke's Mid America Heart and Vascular Institute
  • Ochsner Heart and Vascular Clinic
  • University College Cork
  • American College of Cardiology
  • Thomas Jefferson University
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital Brisbane
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: We describe characteristics associated with use of endarterectomy (CEA) versus stenting (CAS) in patients before urgent cardiac surgery. Background: The optimal modality of carotid revascularization preceding cardiac surgery is unknown. Methods: Retrospective evaluation of the CARE (Carotid Artery Revascularization and Endarterectomy) registry from January 2005 to April 2010 was performed on patients undergoing CEA or CAS preceding urgent cardiac surgery within 30 days. Baseline characteristics were compared, and multivariate adjustment was performed. Results: Of 451 patients who met study criteria, 255 underwent CAS and 196 underwent CEA. Both procedures increased over time to a similar degree (p = 0.18). Patients undergoing CAS had more frequent history of peripheral artery disease (38.2% vs. 26.5%, p < 0.01), neck surgery (5.5% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.01), neck radiation (4.3% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.04), left-main coronary disease (34.8% vs. 23.5%, p < 0.01), neurological events (45.8% vs. 31.3%, p < 0.01), carotid intervention (20.8% vs. 7.6%, p < 0.01), and higher baseline creatinine (1.3 vs. 1.1 mg/dl, p = 0.02). The target carotid arteries of CAS patients were more likely to be symptomatic in the 6 months before revascularization and have restenosis from prior CEA. Patients undergoing CAS had a lower American Society of Anesthesiology grade. Midwest hospitals were less likely to perform CAS than CEA, whereas in the other regions CAS was more common (p < 0.01). Non-Caucasian race, a history of heart failure, previous carotid procedures, prior stroke, left main coronary artery stenosis, lower American Society of Anesthesiology grade, and teaching hospital were independent predictors of patients who would receive CAS. Conclusions: Carotid artery stenting and CEA have increased among patients undergoing urgent cardiac surgery. Patients who underwent CAS had more vascular disease but lower acute pre-surgical risk. Significant regional variation in procedure selection exists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1200-1208
Number of pages9
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume4
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • carotid artery stenting
  • carotid endarterectomy
  • carotid revascularization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Carotid revascularization immediately before urgent cardiac surgery: Practice patterns associated with the choice of carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy: A report from the CARE (Carotid Artery Revascularization and Endarterectomy) registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this