TY - JOUR
T1 - Characteristics and attitudes of first round invitees in the Irish National Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme
AU - Oreilly, Susanne M.
AU - Hughes, Katie N.
AU - Mooney, Therese
AU - Fitzpatrick, Patricia
AU - O'Donoghue, Diarmuid
AU - McNally, Sara
AU - Codd, Mary
AU - Ryan, Elizabeth
AU - Doherty, Glen
AU - Mason, Olivia
AU - Mulcahy, Hugh E.
AU - Cullen, Garret
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©
PY - 2021/9/1
Y1 - 2021/9/1
N2 - Background/objective Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is proven to reduce CRC-related mortality. Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-positive clients in the Irish National CRC Screening Programme underwent colonoscopy. Round 1 uptake was 40.2%. We sought to identify barriers to participation by assessing knowledge of CRC screening and examining attitudes towards FIT test and colonoscopy. Methods Questionnaires based on a modified Champion's Health Belief Model were mailed to 3500 invitees: 1000 FIT-positive, 1000 FIT-negative and 1500 non-participants. 44% responded: 550 (46%) FIT-positive, 577 (48%) FIT-negative and 69 (6%) non-responders (NR). Results 25% of respondents (n=286) did not perceive a personal risk of cancer, did not perceive CRC to be a serious disease and did not perceive benefits to screening. These opinions were more likely to be expressed by men (p=0.035). One-fifth (n=251) found screening stressful. Fear of cancer diagnosis and test results were associated with stress. FIT-positive clients, women and those with social medical insurance were more likely to experience stress. Conclusions The CRC screening process causes stress to one-fifth of participants. Greater use of media and involvement of healthcare professionals in disseminating information on the benefits of screening may lead to higher uptake in round 2.
AB - Background/objective Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is proven to reduce CRC-related mortality. Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-positive clients in the Irish National CRC Screening Programme underwent colonoscopy. Round 1 uptake was 40.2%. We sought to identify barriers to participation by assessing knowledge of CRC screening and examining attitudes towards FIT test and colonoscopy. Methods Questionnaires based on a modified Champion's Health Belief Model were mailed to 3500 invitees: 1000 FIT-positive, 1000 FIT-negative and 1500 non-participants. 44% responded: 550 (46%) FIT-positive, 577 (48%) FIT-negative and 69 (6%) non-responders (NR). Results 25% of respondents (n=286) did not perceive a personal risk of cancer, did not perceive CRC to be a serious disease and did not perceive benefits to screening. These opinions were more likely to be expressed by men (p=0.035). One-fifth (n=251) found screening stressful. Fear of cancer diagnosis and test results were associated with stress. FIT-positive clients, women and those with social medical insurance were more likely to experience stress. Conclusions The CRC screening process causes stress to one-fifth of participants. Greater use of media and involvement of healthcare professionals in disseminating information on the benefits of screening may lead to higher uptake in round 2.
KW - colorectal cancer
KW - colorectal cancer screening
KW - screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086790077&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/flgastro-2020-101417
DO - 10.1136/flgastro-2020-101417
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85086790077
SN - 2041-4137
VL - 12
SP - 374
EP - 379
JO - Frontline Gastroenterology
JF - Frontline Gastroenterology
IS - 5
ER -