TY - CHAP
T1 - Characterization of Amyloidogenic Peptide Aggregability in Helical Subspace
AU - Bhattacharya, Shayon
AU - Xu, Liang
AU - Thompson, Damien
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Prototypical amyloidogenic peptides amyloid-β (Aβ) and α-synuclein (αS) can undergo helix–helix associations via partially folded helical conformers, which may influence pathological progression to Alzheimer’s (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD), respectively. At the other extreme, stable folded helical conformers have been reported to resist self-assembly and amyloid formation. Experimental characterisation of such disparities in aggregation profiles due to subtle differences in peptide stabilities is precluded by the conformational heterogeneity of helical subspace. The diverse physical models used in molecular simulations allow sampling distinct regions of the phase space and are extensive in capturing the ensemble of rich helical subspace. Robust and powerful computational predictive methods utilizing network theory and free energy mapping can model the origin of helical population shifts in amyloidogenic peptides, which highlight their inherent aggregability. In this chapter, we discuss computational models, methods, design rules, and strategies to identify the driving force behind helical self-assembly and the molecular origin of aggregation resistance in helical intermediates of Aβ42 and αS. By extensive multiscale mapping of intrapeptide interactions, we show that the computational models can capture features that are otherwise imperceptible to experiments. Our models predict that targeting terminal residues may allow modulation and control of initial pathogenic aggregability of amyloidogenic peptides.
AB - Prototypical amyloidogenic peptides amyloid-β (Aβ) and α-synuclein (αS) can undergo helix–helix associations via partially folded helical conformers, which may influence pathological progression to Alzheimer’s (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD), respectively. At the other extreme, stable folded helical conformers have been reported to resist self-assembly and amyloid formation. Experimental characterisation of such disparities in aggregation profiles due to subtle differences in peptide stabilities is precluded by the conformational heterogeneity of helical subspace. The diverse physical models used in molecular simulations allow sampling distinct regions of the phase space and are extensive in capturing the ensemble of rich helical subspace. Robust and powerful computational predictive methods utilizing network theory and free energy mapping can model the origin of helical population shifts in amyloidogenic peptides, which highlight their inherent aggregability. In this chapter, we discuss computational models, methods, design rules, and strategies to identify the driving force behind helical self-assembly and the molecular origin of aggregation resistance in helical intermediates of Aβ42 and αS. By extensive multiscale mapping of intrapeptide interactions, we show that the computational models can capture features that are otherwise imperceptible to experiments. Our models predict that targeting terminal residues may allow modulation and control of initial pathogenic aggregability of amyloidogenic peptides.
KW - Central hydrophobic domain
KW - Charged terminal groups
KW - Cross-correlation network analyses
KW - Helical intermediates
KW - Intrinsically disordered proteins
KW - Molecular dynamics simulations
KW - Neurodegenerative disease
KW - Peptide self-assembly
KW - Predictive molecular design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124620443&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-1-0716-1546-1_18
DO - 10.1007/978-1-0716-1546-1_18
M3 - Chapter
C2 - 35167084
AN - SCOPUS:85124620443
T3 - Methods in Molecular Biology
SP - 401
EP - 448
BT - Methods in Molecular Biology
PB - Humana Press Inc.
ER -