TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterization of simultaneous evolution of size and composition distributions using generalized aggregation population balance equation
AU - Singh, Mehakpreet
AU - Kumar, Ashish
AU - Shirazian, Saeed
AU - Ranade, Vivek
AU - Walker, Gavin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The application of multi-dimensional population balance equations (PBEs) for the simulation of granulation processes is recommended due to the multi-component system. Irrespective of the application area, numerical scheme selection for solving multi-dimensional PBEs is driven by the accuracy in (size) number density prediction alone. However, mixing the components, i.e., the particles (excipients and API) and the binding liquid, plays a crucial role in predicting the granule compositional distribution during the pharmaceutical granulation. A numerical scheme should, therefore, be able to predict this accurately. Here, we compare the cell average technique (CAT) and finite volume scheme (FVS) in terms of their accuracy and applicability in predicting the mixing state. To quantify the degree of mixing in the system, the sum-square χ2 parameter is studied to observe the deviation in the amount binder from its average. It has been illustrated that the accurate prediction of integral moments computed by the FVS leads to an inaccurate prediction of the χ2 parameter for a bicomponent population balance equation. Moreover, the cell average technique (CAT) predicts the moments with moderate accuracy; however, it computes the mixing of components χ2 parameter with higher precision than the finite volume scheme. The numerical testing is performed for some benchmarking kernels corresponding to which the analytical solutions are available in the literature. It will be also shown that both numerical methods equally well predict the average size of the particles formed in the system; however, the finite volume scheme takes less time to compute these results.
AB - The application of multi-dimensional population balance equations (PBEs) for the simulation of granulation processes is recommended due to the multi-component system. Irrespective of the application area, numerical scheme selection for solving multi-dimensional PBEs is driven by the accuracy in (size) number density prediction alone. However, mixing the components, i.e., the particles (excipients and API) and the binding liquid, plays a crucial role in predicting the granule compositional distribution during the pharmaceutical granulation. A numerical scheme should, therefore, be able to predict this accurately. Here, we compare the cell average technique (CAT) and finite volume scheme (FVS) in terms of their accuracy and applicability in predicting the mixing state. To quantify the degree of mixing in the system, the sum-square χ2 parameter is studied to observe the deviation in the amount binder from its average. It has been illustrated that the accurate prediction of integral moments computed by the FVS leads to an inaccurate prediction of the χ2 parameter for a bicomponent population balance equation. Moreover, the cell average technique (CAT) predicts the moments with moderate accuracy; however, it computes the mixing of components χ2 parameter with higher precision than the finite volume scheme. The numerical testing is performed for some benchmarking kernels corresponding to which the analytical solutions are available in the literature. It will be also shown that both numerical methods equally well predict the average size of the particles formed in the system; however, the finite volume scheme takes less time to compute these results.
KW - Aggregation
KW - Cell average technique
KW - Finite volume scheme
KW - Integral moments
KW - Mixing of components
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097238796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/pharmaceutics12121152
DO - 10.3390/pharmaceutics12121152
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85097238796
SN - 1999-4923
VL - 12
SP - 1
EP - 17
JO - Pharmaceutics
JF - Pharmaceutics
IS - 12
M1 - 1152
ER -