TY - JOUR
T1 - Co-design of a Treatment Algorithm for People With Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tendon Tears
T2 - The CALMeR Cuff Pathway
AU - Fahy, Kathryn
AU - Galvin, Rose
AU - Lewis, Jeremy
AU - Ginn, Karen
AU - Glynn, Liam
AU - Cassidy, John Tristan
AU - McCreesh, Karen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy®. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - OBJECTIVE: Using an experience-based codesign (EBCD) approach, to co-design a treatment algorithm to support and enhance assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of people presenting with large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears (for ease of reading, we will use the term “rotator cuff tears”) in primary health care settings. DESIGN: Mixed-methods study underpinned by EBCD with involvement of clinicians and people with rotator cuff tears. METHODS: Using an EBCD process, people with rotator cuff tears and clinicians participated in 3 workshops. Then, the data were analyzed, summarized, and refined until a group consensus was reached, and synthesized to produce the final treatment algorithm. RESULTS: Eleven people with rotator cuff tears and 12 clinicians participated. The co-design group identified 10 clinical action points to support the clinical assessment and surgical and nonsurgical management of rotator cuff tears. The clinical action points included clinicians speaking with 1 voice, adopting a consistent approach to education, setting realistic expectations, collecting sufficient and relevant outcome measures, and using a common approach to shared decision making. The collective outcome was a comprehensive approach for large to massive rotator cuff tears (“CALMeR Cuff”), which serves as a shoulder pain care pathway. CONCLUSION: Our co-design approach involved people with rotator cuff tears and ensured that the CALMeR Cuff pathway can provide consistent, evidence-based care for people with rotator cuff tears.
AB - OBJECTIVE: Using an experience-based codesign (EBCD) approach, to co-design a treatment algorithm to support and enhance assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of people presenting with large to massive rotator cuff tendon tears (for ease of reading, we will use the term “rotator cuff tears”) in primary health care settings. DESIGN: Mixed-methods study underpinned by EBCD with involvement of clinicians and people with rotator cuff tears. METHODS: Using an EBCD process, people with rotator cuff tears and clinicians participated in 3 workshops. Then, the data were analyzed, summarized, and refined until a group consensus was reached, and synthesized to produce the final treatment algorithm. RESULTS: Eleven people with rotator cuff tears and 12 clinicians participated. The co-design group identified 10 clinical action points to support the clinical assessment and surgical and nonsurgical management of rotator cuff tears. The clinical action points included clinicians speaking with 1 voice, adopting a consistent approach to education, setting realistic expectations, collecting sufficient and relevant outcome measures, and using a common approach to shared decision making. The collective outcome was a comprehensive approach for large to massive rotator cuff tears (“CALMeR Cuff”), which serves as a shoulder pain care pathway. CONCLUSION: Our co-design approach involved people with rotator cuff tears and ensured that the CALMeR Cuff pathway can provide consistent, evidence-based care for people with rotator cuff tears.
KW - algorithm
KW - co-design
KW - pathway
KW - rotator cuff
KW - shoulder pain
KW - stakeholders
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105006856981
U2 - 10.2519/jospt.2025.13342
DO - 10.2519/jospt.2025.13342
M3 - Article
C2 - 40418361
AN - SCOPUS:105006856981
SN - 0190-6011
VL - 55
SP - 431
EP - 439
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
IS - 6
ER -