TY - GEN
T1 - COMBINED STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE ACTIVE LEARNING AND RETENTION
AU - Tanner, David
AU - Canty, Donal
AU - Power, Jason
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference 2019.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Retention rates in engineering courses in Ireland and worldwide are an increasing problem. There are numerous reasons for students not progressing to the second year of their STEM courses, which can include everything from issues related to the transition from a school setting to University and living away from home. The volume of theoretical work undertaken in large lecture theatres can be off-putting to new students, who can feel isolated and can struggle with the new content and learning environments. In the first year, students often cannot visualize how the individual subjects covered are going to lead them to their engineering degree. This paper aims to analyze the introduction of an active learning component through the repurposing of a first-year spring semester module while maintaining the existing learning outcomes. A Design-Build-Compete (DBC) project requires students to work in teams to design and build a vehicle to transport a payload up a 15m slope. It requires students to use mechanics calculations along with engineering design and drawing principles to design this vehicle. Students are encouraged to employ related prior learning such as computer coding and mechanics equations learned in the previous semester to optimize their designs. To support students at the developmental stage of their designing, the module assessment approach utilizes Adaptive Comparative Judgment (ACJ) as a medium to engage students in peer assessment. This process is based on the students making multiple holistic comparative judgments on peers’ work, presented in an e-portfolio, generating a rank order of perceived quality by the group. Students also generate formative feedback through the ACJ platform, which contributes to the knowledge-building process. This has an added meta-cognitive benefit where the student is encouraged to reflect on their own design based on their judgement activity prior to receiving feedback on their individual submission. This process is repeated later in the module when the final team report/portfolios are submitted. Students work on different sections of this report and submit it as a team and then build the vehicle in the workshop using basic workshop tools. At the end of the module, all teams take part in a timed race, sponsored by local industry (Modular Automation and J&J Automation Centre of Excellence). At this event, each team is interviewed by practicing engineers who provide feedback on the project and ultimately award a number of prizes related to performance, design and teamwork.
AB - Retention rates in engineering courses in Ireland and worldwide are an increasing problem. There are numerous reasons for students not progressing to the second year of their STEM courses, which can include everything from issues related to the transition from a school setting to University and living away from home. The volume of theoretical work undertaken in large lecture theatres can be off-putting to new students, who can feel isolated and can struggle with the new content and learning environments. In the first year, students often cannot visualize how the individual subjects covered are going to lead them to their engineering degree. This paper aims to analyze the introduction of an active learning component through the repurposing of a first-year spring semester module while maintaining the existing learning outcomes. A Design-Build-Compete (DBC) project requires students to work in teams to design and build a vehicle to transport a payload up a 15m slope. It requires students to use mechanics calculations along with engineering design and drawing principles to design this vehicle. Students are encouraged to employ related prior learning such as computer coding and mechanics equations learned in the previous semester to optimize their designs. To support students at the developmental stage of their designing, the module assessment approach utilizes Adaptive Comparative Judgment (ACJ) as a medium to engage students in peer assessment. This process is based on the students making multiple holistic comparative judgments on peers’ work, presented in an e-portfolio, generating a rank order of perceived quality by the group. Students also generate formative feedback through the ACJ platform, which contributes to the knowledge-building process. This has an added meta-cognitive benefit where the student is encouraged to reflect on their own design based on their judgement activity prior to receiving feedback on their individual submission. This process is repeated later in the module when the final team report/portfolios are submitted. Students work on different sections of this report and submit it as a team and then build the vehicle in the workshop using basic workshop tools. At the end of the module, all teams take part in a timed race, sponsored by local industry (Modular Automation and J&J Automation Centre of Excellence). At this event, each team is interviewed by practicing engineers who provide feedback on the project and ultimately award a number of prizes related to performance, design and teamwork.
KW - Active Learning
KW - Adaptive Comparative Judgement
KW - Design-Build-Compete
KW - Integrated Curriculum
KW - Standards: 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11
KW - Student Retention
KW - Team-Based Approach
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145953657&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85145953657
T3 - Proceedings of the International CDIO Conference
SP - 580
EP - 590
BT - 15th International CDIO Conference, CDIO 2019 - Proceedings
A2 - Bennedsen, Jens
A2 - Lauritsen, Aage Birkkjaer
A2 - Edstrom, Kristina
A2 - Kuptasthien, Natha
A2 - Roslof, Janne
A2 - Songer, Robert
PB - Chalmers University of Technology
T2 - 15th International CDIO Conference, CDIO 2019
Y2 - 24 June 2019 through 28 June 2019
ER -