TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithmsfor building archetypes development in urban building energy modeling
AU - Ali, Usman
AU - Shamsi, Mohammad Haris
AU - Alshehri, Fawaz
AU - Mangina, Eleni
AU - O'Donnell, James
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 ASHRAE (www.ashrae.org) and IBPSA-USA (www.ibpsa.us).
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - The most common approach for urban building energy modeling (UBEM) involves segmenting a building stock into archetypes. Development Building archetypes for urban scale is a complex task and requires a lot of extensive data. The archetype development methodology proposed in this paper uses unsupervised machine learning approaches to identify similar clusters of buildings based on building specific features. The archetype development process considers four crucial processes of machine learning: data preprocessing, feature selection, clustering algorithm adaptation and results validation. The four different clustering algorithms investigated in this study are K-Mean, Hierarchical, Density-based, K-Medoids. All the algorithms are applied on Irish Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) that consist of 203 features. The obtained results are then used to compare and analyze the chosen algorithms with respect to performance, quality and clus-ter instances. The K-mean algorithm preforms the best in terms of cluster formation.
AB - The most common approach for urban building energy modeling (UBEM) involves segmenting a building stock into archetypes. Development Building archetypes for urban scale is a complex task and requires a lot of extensive data. The archetype development methodology proposed in this paper uses unsupervised machine learning approaches to identify similar clusters of buildings based on building specific features. The archetype development process considers four crucial processes of machine learning: data preprocessing, feature selection, clustering algorithm adaptation and results validation. The four different clustering algorithms investigated in this study are K-Mean, Hierarchical, Density-based, K-Medoids. All the algorithms are applied on Irish Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) that consist of 203 features. The obtained results are then used to compare and analyze the chosen algorithms with respect to performance, quality and clus-ter instances. The K-mean algorithm preforms the best in terms of cluster formation.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85070605012
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85070605012
SN - 2574-6308
SP - 60
EP - 67
JO - ASHRAE and IBPSA-USA Building Simulation Conference
JF - ASHRAE and IBPSA-USA Building Simulation Conference
T2 - 2018 ASHRAE/IBPSA-USA Building Simulation Conference: Building Performance Modeling, SimBuild 2018
Y2 - 26 September 2018 through 28 September 2018
ER -