Comparing the clinical-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an internetdelivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention with a waiting list control among adults with chronic pain: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

  • Sara Hayes
  • , Michael Hogan
  • , Haulie Dowd
  • , Edel Doherty
  • , Siobhan O'Higgins
  • , Saoirse Nic Gabhainn
  • , Padraig MacNeela
  • , Andrew W Murphy
  • , Thomas Kropmans
  • , Ciaran O'Neill
  • , John Newell
  • , Brian E McGuire

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    INTRODUCTION: Internet-delivered psychological interventions among people with chronic pain have the potential to overcome environmental and economic barriers to the provision of evidence-based psychological treatment in the Irish health service context. While the use of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy programmes has been consistently shown to have small-to-moderate effects in the management of chronic pain, there is a paucity in the research regarding the effectiveness of an internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) programme among people with chronic pain. The current study will compare the clinical-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an online ACT intervention with a waitlist control condition in terms of the management of pain-related functional interference among people with chronic pain.

    METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants with non-malignant pain that persists for at least 3 months will be randomised to one of two study conditions. The experimental group will undergo an eight-session internet-delivered ACT programme over an 8-week period. The control group will be a waiting list group and will be offered the ACT intervention after the 3-month follow-up period. Participants will be assessed preintervention, postintervention and at a 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome will be pain-related functional interference. Secondary outcomes will include: pain intensity, depression, global impression of change, acceptance of chronic pain and quality of life. A qualitative evaluation of the perspectives of the participants regarding the ACT intervention will be completed after the trial.

    ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be performed in agreement with the Declaration of Helsinki and is approved by the National University of Ireland Galway Research Ethics Committee (12/05/05). The results of the trial will be published according to the CONSORT statement and will be presented at conferences and reported in peer-reviewed journals.

    TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN18166896.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere005092
    Pages (from-to)e005092
    JournalBMJ Open
    Volume4
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy/economics
    • Adult
    • Chronic Pain/therapy
    • Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • Humans
    • Internet
    • Research Design
    • Single-Blind Method
    • Treatment Outcome
    • Waiting Lists

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing the clinical-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an internetdelivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention with a waiting list control among adults with chronic pain: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this