Abstract
This paper seeks to apply a number of biophysical sustainability metrics to an Irish city-region in order to evaluate the effect of methodological pluralism when measuring urban sustainability and to determine the outcome of using more than one method when measuring the sustainability of the same system boundary at a city-region level. It is concluded that a 'toolkit' approach can be useful in highlighting commonalities and differences between different metrics as well as capturing some of the deficiencies inherent in using a single biophysical metric. In addition, this paper develops an approach to measuring energy metabolism by outlining and applying the 'energy flow metabolism ratio analysis' methodology, which is used to measure the ratio of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as a function of energy material inputs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 97-107 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Ecological Economics |
| Volume | 83 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Ecological footprint analysis
- Energy flow accounting
- Energy metabolism
- Methodological pluralism
- Urban sustainability indicators
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of energy flow accounting, energy flow metabolism ratio analysis and ecological footprinting as tools for measuring urban sustainability: A case-study of an Irish city-region'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver