Comparison of lipid droplet extraction from cell wall-deficient Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with pulsed electric fields or osmotic shock

Julia Baumgartner, Sing Teng Chua, Maylin Blunier, Fengzheng Gao, Naomi Arita-Merino, Fabian Abiusi, Lorraine Archer, Krzysztof Cybulski, Alison G. Smith, Michael H.P. Studer, Alexander Mathys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Microalgal lipid droplets (LDs) are promising sources of pre-emulsified triacylglycerols (TAGs) and can be extracted aqueously due to their hydrophilicity. To develop more sustainable extraction processes, pulsed electric fields (PEF) and osmotic shock (OS) with NaCl were compared as treatments before aqueous LD extraction from a cell wall-deficient microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The highest LD extraction yields were 54% (0.6 g L−1) using OS and 42% (0.5 g L−1) with PEF. Both treatments were most effective with cells from the late stationary phase of growth. LD extracts from both processes exhibited a TAG composition similar to the original biomass. LDs recovered after PEF appeared native (diameters from 1.4 to 2.0 μm), whereas OS caused LD coalescence (diameters from 1.9 to 2.6 μm). Both methods co-extracted nitrogenous compounds, while OS also co-extracted chlorophyll. OS and PEF for aqueous LD extraction provide greener alternatives to the widespread extraction of lipid using organic solvents.

Original languageEnglish
Article number132764
JournalBioresource Technology
Volume434
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Fatty acid and triacylglycerol profile
  • Microalgae
  • Oil bodies
  • Pulsed electric fields
  • Solvent-free aqueous extraction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of lipid droplet extraction from cell wall-deficient Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with pulsed electric fields or osmotic shock'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this