Competency assessment methods tools and processes: A survey of nurse preceptors in Ireland: A survey of nurse preceptors in Ireland

Irene Cassidy, Mary Pat Butler, Bernie Quillinan, Anne Fahy, Carmel Bradshaw, Dympna Tuohy, Maureen O'Connor, Mary C. Mc Namara, Geraldine Egan, Catherine Tierney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Determining student nurses' clinical competence is underpinned by significant challenges including a lack of reliable assessments methods and multiple factors that impact on the assessment function of preceptors. The purpose of this study was to explore preceptors' views and experiences of a competency assessment tool and process used to assess BSc student nurses' clinical competence. Data were collected using a mixed method descriptive approach that included focus groups (n= 16) and a survey of preceptors (n= 837) in general, mental health and intellectual disability nursing in Ireland. This paper reports the results of the preceptor survey, which yielded a response rate of 30.4%. Findings revealed that preceptors had difficulty in understanding the language used in the competency assessment document. There was a lack of continuity of the same preceptor to students over the assessment period and over half of the preceptors gave less than 30. min to the formal interview process. Preceptors more often assessed knowledge and attitudes compared to skills. Matching preceptor roster with students, standardisation of the process and a moderator system to support the integrity of competency assessment is recommended.

Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
Pages (from-to)298-303
Number of pages6
JournalNurse Education in Practice
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

Keywords

  • Competency assessment
  • Preceptors
  • Student nurses

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Competency assessment methods tools and processes: A survey of nurse preceptors in Ireland: A survey of nurse preceptors in Ireland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this