Corporate social responsibility and independent employee representation: an ethical contradiction?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Many familiar global corporations have well-developed corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies that enunciate socially caring values that include the dignity and well-being of their employees. Yet opposition to independent employee voice from companies with trumpeted CSR credentials indicates an uncomfortable contradiction between rhetoric and reality in the treatment of employees as valued stakeholders. The purpose of this paper is to explore these contradictions using the lens of a libertarian tradition. Design/methodology/approach: The CSR statements of three companies are examined to provide the context for their espoused values towards employees. Media, trade union and academic publications on each of the companies are then considered to identify systematic evidence of anti-union practices. Findings: The paper illustrates the paradox of companies with espoused CSR policies advocating the dignity and well-being of their employees with often explicit coercive anti-union practices. These practices are a constraint on the negative freedom/liberty of employees in the libertarian tradition and amount to unethical behaviour on the part of the firm. Originality/value: The paper offers important insights into the disconnection common in many firms between normative ethical claims in CSR statements to treat employees as valued legitimate stakeholders and the reality in the workplace.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)742-756
Number of pages15
JournalEmployee Relations
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Authoritarianism
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Decoupling
  • Ethical behaviour
  • Libertarianism
  • Negative freedom
  • Trade unions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corporate social responsibility and independent employee representation: an ethical contradiction?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this