Abstract
A number of international jurisdictions have articulated a longer term goal of zero emission housing standards. However, in Australia, housing energy efficiency remains a contested policy area. In part, this is due to a lack of clear cost-benefit information on low emission housing standards, including impacts at the household level. This research investigated the lifetime economics of low emission housing options for typical housing in Melbourne, Australia. The analysis found that for a zero emission house, there was an additional capital cost of $25,637. This translated into extra yearly mortgage repayments of $2,117 at an interest rate of 7.89% across 25 years. However, energy efficiency cost savings of $1,547 a year were calculated, leaving a gap of $570/year in additional mortgage repayments. As a result, policy makers in Australia should focus on reducing upfront costs and developing innovative financial frameworks in order to make low emission housing achievable.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 374-386 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | International Journal of Sustainable Development |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Affordable
- Cost efficient low emission housing
- Emissions
- Household cash-flows
- Housing policy
- Life-cycle cost
- Lifecycle
- Melbourne, Australia
- Renewable energy
- Sustainable development
- ZEH
- Zero emission housing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cost efficient low-emission housing: Implications for household cash-flows in Melbourne'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver