Abstract
Using qualitative data, this article makes a substantive and formal contribution to the growing academic literature on bodybuilding and the sociology of the body. Placing a question mark against existing knowledge claims, it argues theories ascribing bodybuilding to antecedent predispositions are not sufficient when accounting for the ongoing variable project of creating 'the perfect body'. It is asserted that physique bodybuilding (as opposed to weight-training) in the late 1990s could be independent of the 'masculinist imagery' of 'the muscular body' alongside feelings of gender and personal insecurity, but is increasingly dependent upon an acquired 'ethnophysiological' appreciation of 'excessive' muscularity. This phenomenological argument, which asserts the agency of bodies in social processes, focuses upon male participants' spatially and temporally contingent heterogeneous body-projects.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 267-290 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Body and Society |
Volume | 5 |
Issue number | 2-3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1999 |