Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cross-Border Application of the Ne Bis In Idem Principle in the Context of Administrative Penalties Criminal in Nature Imposed for Unlawful Commercial Practices

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Administrative penalties criminal in nature imposed by regulatory authorities in a Member State following a criminal conviction in a different State based on identical facts against the same legal person may constitute an infringement of the ne bis in idem principle enshrined in Article 50 CFREU. Article 52(1) CFREU provides for limitations to the application of that principle, which are contingent on compliance the principle of proportionality and sufficient coordination of proceedings and penalties. In Volkswagen Group Italia SpA (VWGI) and Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft (VWAG) C-27/22, the CJEU provided further clarification the conditions under which limitations to Article 50 CFREU may be justified in the context of administrative penalties criminal in nature imposed for unlawful commercial practices. This article examines the significance and implications of the judgment, which is the first CJEU ruling on duplication of proceedings and penalties by two states enforcing different legal objectives.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2026

Keywords

  • administrative penalties criminal in nature
  • Article 50 CFREU
  • Article 52(1) CFREU
  • coordination of proceedings
  • cross-border offences
  • different legal objectives
  • duplication of proceedings and penalties
  • identical facts
  • ne bis in idem
  • same offence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-Border Application of the Ne Bis In Idem Principle in the Context of Administrative Penalties Criminal in Nature Imposed for Unlawful Commercial Practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this