TY - GEN
T1 - DECIPHERING FRAMEWORKS FOR WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IN COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
T2 - 41st Annual Conference on Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2025
AU - McElwee, Anthony
AU - Spillane, John P.
AU - Bradley, James G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2025 - Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The increasing scale and multidisciplinary nature of complex projects such as data centres or hospitals have amplified the need for structured, encompassing, and effective Work Breakdown Structures (WBS) to ensure successful project delivery. The aim of this research is to conduct a systematic literature review to identify existing WBS development frameworks. Specifically, the study seeks to 1) categorise available guidance, and 2) explore the frameworks for cohesion and applicability. The research method investigates findings from initially fifty-three publications and narrows to thirty-three using online databases, that focus on WBS development and implementation on construction projects. The investigation concludes the available literature falls into three main categories: international standards, project specific, and project management guidance. The findings reveal that standards lack depth for complex projects, while tools like artificial neural networks are narrow in scope and complex to implement. Project management guidance emphasizes scope clarity, however, fail to outline methods in which to develop a WBS for construction and iterative tasks, highlighting fragmented literature and gaps in WBS frameworks, emphasising the need for robust methodologies adaptable to complex projects.
AB - The increasing scale and multidisciplinary nature of complex projects such as data centres or hospitals have amplified the need for structured, encompassing, and effective Work Breakdown Structures (WBS) to ensure successful project delivery. The aim of this research is to conduct a systematic literature review to identify existing WBS development frameworks. Specifically, the study seeks to 1) categorise available guidance, and 2) explore the frameworks for cohesion and applicability. The research method investigates findings from initially fifty-three publications and narrows to thirty-three using online databases, that focus on WBS development and implementation on construction projects. The investigation concludes the available literature falls into three main categories: international standards, project specific, and project management guidance. The findings reveal that standards lack depth for complex projects, while tools like artificial neural networks are narrow in scope and complex to implement. Project management guidance emphasizes scope clarity, however, fail to outline methods in which to develop a WBS for construction and iterative tasks, highlighting fragmented literature and gaps in WBS frameworks, emphasising the need for robust methodologies adaptable to complex projects.
KW - buildability
KW - construction planning
KW - contracting
KW - productivity
KW - project management
KW - stakeholders
KW - standardisation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021981481
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105021981481
T3 - Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2025 - Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference
SP - 629
EP - 638
BT - Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2025 - Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference
A2 - Thomson, Craig
A2 - Neilson, Christopher J
PB - Association of Researchers in Construction Management
Y2 - 1 September 2025 through 3 September 2025
ER -