Abstract
The apparent rise in precarious work has received increased attention in a number of countries in recent decades. However, studies highlight the difficulties of both defining and capturing the extent of precarious work. In this paper, we report on a study of zero hours contracts in Ireland and drawing on the varieties of capitalism framework, examine the lessons for both LMEs and CMEs. The study found that zero hours contracts, as defined by Irish legislation, were not common; however, evidence of ‘If and When' contracts emerged during the course of the research. We outline our key findings showing how information garnered from qualitative research provided nuanced insights on the reality of precarious work, which was not captured in the national data set. This is important for measuring the extent of precarious work in future studies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 75-93 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | SpecialIssue 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Atypical employment
- If and when contracts
- Labor market
- On-call work
- Precarious work
- Varieties of capitalism
- Zero hours contracts
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Defining and Regulating Zero Hours Work: Lessons from a Liberal Market Economy1'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver