TY - JOUR
T1 - Delirium phenomenology
T2 - What can we learn from the symptoms of delirium?
AU - Gupta, Nitin
AU - de Jonghe, Jos
AU - Schieveld, Jan
AU - Leonard, Maeve
AU - Meagher, David
PY - 2008/9
Y1 - 2008/9
N2 - Objectives: This review focuses on phenomenological studies of delirium, including subsyndromal and prodromal concepts, and their relevance to other elements of clinical profile. Methods: A Medline search using the keywords delirium, phenomenology, and symptoms for new data articles published in English between 1998 and 2008 was utilized. The search was supplemented by additional material not identified by Medline but known to the authors. Results: Understanding of prodromal and subsyndromal concepts is still in its infancy. The characteristic profile can differentiate delirium from other neuropsychiatric disorders. Clinical (motoric) subtyping holds potential but more consistent methods are needed. Studies are almost entirely cross-sectional in design and generally lack comprehensive symptom assessment. Multiple assessment tools are available but are oriented towards hyperactive features and few have demonstrated ability to distinguish delirium from dementia. There is insufficient evidence linking specific phenomenology with etiology, pathophysiology, management, course, and outcome. Conclusions: Despite the major advancements of the past decade in many aspects of delirium research, further phenomenological work is crucial to targeting studies of causation, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognosis. We identified eight key areas for future studies.
AB - Objectives: This review focuses on phenomenological studies of delirium, including subsyndromal and prodromal concepts, and their relevance to other elements of clinical profile. Methods: A Medline search using the keywords delirium, phenomenology, and symptoms for new data articles published in English between 1998 and 2008 was utilized. The search was supplemented by additional material not identified by Medline but known to the authors. Results: Understanding of prodromal and subsyndromal concepts is still in its infancy. The characteristic profile can differentiate delirium from other neuropsychiatric disorders. Clinical (motoric) subtyping holds potential but more consistent methods are needed. Studies are almost entirely cross-sectional in design and generally lack comprehensive symptom assessment. Multiple assessment tools are available but are oriented towards hyperactive features and few have demonstrated ability to distinguish delirium from dementia. There is insufficient evidence linking specific phenomenology with etiology, pathophysiology, management, course, and outcome. Conclusions: Despite the major advancements of the past decade in many aspects of delirium research, further phenomenological work is crucial to targeting studies of causation, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognosis. We identified eight key areas for future studies.
KW - Delirium
KW - Phenomenology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49149114512&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.05.020
DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.05.020
M3 - Review article
C2 - 18707943
AN - SCOPUS:49149114512
SN - 0022-3999
VL - 65
SP - 215
EP - 222
JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Research
JF - Journal of Psychosomatic Research
IS - 3
ER -