TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a theory of implementation and integration
T2 - Normalization Process Theory
AU - May, Carl R.
AU - Mair, Frances
AU - Finch, Tracy
AU - MacFarlane, Anne
AU - Dowrick, Christopher
AU - Treweek, Shaun
AU - Rapley, Tim
AU - Ballini, Luciana
AU - Ong, Bie Nio
AU - Rogers, Anne
AU - Murray, Elizabeth
AU - Elwyn, Glyn
AU - Légaré, France
AU - Gunn, Jane
AU - Montori, Victor M.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Background. Theories are important tools in the social and natural sciences. The methods by which they are derived are rarely described and discussed. Normalization Process Theory explains how new technologies, ways of acting, and ways of working become routinely embedded in everyday practice, and has applications in the study of implementation processes. This paper describes the process by which it was built. Methods. Between 1998 and 2008, we developed a theory. We derived a set of empirical generalizations from analysis of data collected in qualitative studies of healthcare work and organization. We developed an applied theoretical model through analysis of empirical generalizations. Finally, we built a formal theory through a process of extension and implication analysis of the applied theoretical model. Results. Each phase of theory development showed that the constructs of the theory did not conflict with each other, had explanatory power, and possessed sufficient robustness for formal testing. As the theory developed, its scope expanded from a set of observed regularities in data with procedural explanations, to an applied theoretical model, to a formal middle-range theory. Conclusion. Normalization Process Theory has been developed through procedures that were properly sceptical and critical, and which were opened to review at each stage of development. The theory has been shown to merit formal testing.
AB - Background. Theories are important tools in the social and natural sciences. The methods by which they are derived are rarely described and discussed. Normalization Process Theory explains how new technologies, ways of acting, and ways of working become routinely embedded in everyday practice, and has applications in the study of implementation processes. This paper describes the process by which it was built. Methods. Between 1998 and 2008, we developed a theory. We derived a set of empirical generalizations from analysis of data collected in qualitative studies of healthcare work and organization. We developed an applied theoretical model through analysis of empirical generalizations. Finally, we built a formal theory through a process of extension and implication analysis of the applied theoretical model. Results. Each phase of theory development showed that the constructs of the theory did not conflict with each other, had explanatory power, and possessed sufficient robustness for formal testing. As the theory developed, its scope expanded from a set of observed regularities in data with procedural explanations, to an applied theoretical model, to a formal middle-range theory. Conclusion. Normalization Process Theory has been developed through procedures that were properly sceptical and critical, and which were opened to review at each stage of development. The theory has been shown to merit formal testing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68049117093&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1748-5908-4-29
DO - 10.1186/1748-5908-4-29
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:68049117093
SN - 1748-5908
VL - 4
SP - -
JO - Implementation Science
JF - Implementation Science
IS - 1
M1 - 29
ER -