Diagnosing, fast and slow

J. J. Coughlan, Cormac Francis Mullins, Thomas J. Kiernan

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Diagnostic error is increasingly recognised as a source of significant morbidity and mortality in medicine. In this article, we will attempt to address several questions relating to clinical decision making; How do we decide on a diagnosis? Why do we so often get it wrong? Can we improve our critical faculties? We begin by describing a clinical vignette in which a medical error occurred and resulted in an adverse outcome for a patient. This case leads us to the concepts of heuristic thinking and cognitive bias. We then discuss how this is relevant to our current clinical paradigm, examples of heuristic thinking and potential mechanisms to mitigate bias. The aim of this article is to increase awareness of the role that cognitive bias and heuristic thinking play in medical decision making. We hope to motivate clinicians to reflect on their own patterns of thinking with an overall aim of improving patient care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-109
Number of pages7
JournalPostgraduate Medical Journal
Volume97
Issue number1144
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • adult cardiology
  • Cardiology
  • coronary intervention
  • myocardial infarction
  • valvular heart disease

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnosing, fast and slow'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this