Abstract
Double-breasting has been identified as where companies run union voice and non-union voice mechanisms across different plants. While research has focused on the incidence of such arrangements, there is a dearth of evidence into the dynamics of it. This article seeks to complement existing research by examining the contours of double-breasting in a case study organisation. The findings suggest that more research is necessary into the dynamics of double-breasting in terms of how voice in sites affects each other and the extent to which running different regimes affects the managerial agenda.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 368-384 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | International Journal of Human Resource Management |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- double-breasting
- employee voice
- non-union representation
- union representation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Different rooms, different voices: Double-breasting, multi-channel representation and the managerial agenda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver