Direct comparison between five different microchannels, part 1: Channel manufacture and measurement

Cormac Eason, Tara Dalton, Mark Davies, Cian O'Mathúna, Orla Slattery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper is the first in a two-part study of the pressure-flow characteristics for a range of microchannels. Here, the manufacture of the channels and the resulting quality in terms of the channels' closeness to target dimensions, channel-to-channel variation for each sample, and the difference in area between the assumed perfect rectangular/trapezoidal shape of the channels and their actual cross-section are addressed. Wet etching with KOH produced trapezoidal channels 577 μm wide and 413 μm high. DRIE produced rectangular channels 304 μm wide and 332 μm high. Mechanical sawing produced near rectangular channels in both silicon and plastic. The silicon channels were 52 μm wide and 423 μm deep, and the plastic channels were 203 μm wide × 344 or 382 μm deep. Channel dimensions were measured using a scanning electron microscope. This paper demonstrates the feasibility of producing relatively large microchannels in two materials by three methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-88
Number of pages10
JournalHeat Transfer Engineering
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Direct comparison between five different microchannels, part 1: Channel manufacture and measurement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this