Direct observation of telephone communication between community pharmacies and prescribers in New Zealand

Nastassja Trausch, James A. Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background Phone calls between pharmacists and prescribers play an important role in resolving potential errors and other issues. Despite their importance in patient care, and sometimes causing frustration for pharmacists, there is little research on these calls. Objective To quantify how long calls between pharmacists and prescribers are, how often phone calls occur, why calls are made, and who is called. Method An observational study was conducted with 130.5 h observed in 11 community pharmacies over 8 weeks in Dunedin, New Zealand, recording information about all incoming and outgoing calls. Data captured included information on length, date, time, reason for call, pharmacy staff involved, health professionals involved, and the place being called. We also surveyed pharmacists’ perceptions of this communication. Results Data on 95 phone calls was captured. The mean length was 110 s (95% CI 88–133), at an average of 0.7 calls per hour. The most frequent reasons for calling were clarifications and dose inquiries. Conclusion Calling prescribers is perceived as a frustrating; however the frequency of calls we observed was low, but some were long. The amount of time spent for pharmacist interventions may be reduced using alternative communication methods but these need further study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1005-1009
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
Volume40
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Community pharmacy
  • Interprofessional communication
  • New Zealand
  • Pharmacist intervention
  • Prescriber
  • Telephone call

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Direct observation of telephone communication between community pharmacies and prescribers in New Zealand'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this