Direct versus indirect and individual versus group modes of language therapy for children with primary language impairment principal outcomes from a randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation

James M. Boyle, Elspeth McCartney, Anne O'Hare, John Forbes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background Many schoolage children with language impairments are enrolled in mainstream schools and receive indirect language therapy, but there have been, to the authors' knowledge, no previous controlled studies comparing the outcomes and costs of direct and indirect intervention delivered by qualified therapists and therapy assistants, and each delivery mode offered to children individually or in groups. Aims To investigate the relative effectiveness of indirect and direct intervention therapy modes delivered individually or in groups for children with primary language impairment. Methods & Procedures A multicentre randomized controlled trial investigated 161 children with primary language impairment aged 611 years randomized to a usualtherapy control group or to direct individual, indirect individual, direct group or indirect group therapy modes. Intervention was delivered three times a week for 3040min sessions in mainstream schools over 15 weeks. Language performance was assessed at baseline, posttherapy and at 12 months. Cost analysis was based on salary and travel costs for intervention modes and usual therapy. Outcomes & Results Compared with controls, children receiving project therapy made shortterm improvements in expressive p 0.031, but not receptive, language immediately following intervention. Children with specific expressive language delay were more likely to show improvement than those with mixed receptiveexpressive difficulties. The four project therapy modes did not differ on primary language outcomes all pvalues>0.392 and there were no further improvements evident at followup. Indirect group therapy was the least costly mode, with direct individual therapy the most costly. Conclusions & Implications Intervention in this age group can be effective for expressive language and can be delivered equally effectively though speech and language therapy assistants and to children in groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)826-846
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Journal of Language and Communication Disorders
Volume44
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Developmental language impairment
  • Expressive language
  • Randomized control trial RCT
  • Receptive language
  • Speech and language therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Direct versus indirect and individual versus group modes of language therapy for children with primary language impairment principal outcomes from a randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this